View Full Version : Judging from HP's response
pack3tg0st
06-11-2010, 03:00 PM
He's about as fed up as I am hahaha
Should we reconsider our 'time out' forum idea?
This thread is a Chorlton + BE free zone because I could give two shits about their input...
but we don't ban... do we suspend? do we use a 'time out' forum?
or do we let it all continue...
Mojo? you around? check the admin forums in about 2 mins.
FancyFree
06-11-2010, 03:02 PM
Time out forum.
pack3tg0st
06-11-2010, 03:17 PM
lol only one person has input?
am I to take that as a vote for status quo?
Sokrates
06-11-2010, 03:20 PM
I think you should ban people that are disruptive unless their name is HP.
pack3tg0st
06-11-2010, 03:21 PM
I think you should ban people that are disruptive unless their name is HP.
HP is being Illustrative :D
Lexion
06-11-2010, 03:22 PM
I want my click back.
Sokrates
06-11-2010, 03:23 PM
Ban him on the stake.
pack3tg0st
06-11-2010, 03:25 PM
I want my click back.
lol its up to you guys, I don't really care...
I just remember it being tossed about a few weeks ago...
I'm not even casting a vote on this one...
I've already washed my hands of being responsible for the future success of amkon :)
Snow Crash
06-11-2010, 03:49 PM
DO you really want to deprive BE and CHorlton of the only things they live for? That's so cruel!
MrPenny
06-11-2010, 03:50 PM
Time out forum.
I think it may be more therapeutic to take a time out from the forum.
pack3tg0st
06-11-2010, 03:53 PM
Shit I just realized I shoul dhave a poll at the top...
lemme see if I can figure out this 'moderator control thingie'...
FancyFree
06-11-2010, 03:54 PM
I think it may be more therapeutic to take a time out from the forum.
You are so wise.
Sokrates
06-11-2010, 03:54 PM
time out like a 3-4 day window where you go to other forums and bitch and complain about this forum?
Snow Crash
06-11-2010, 03:54 PM
Shit I just realized I shoul dhave a poll at the top...
lemme see if I can figure out this 'moderator control thingie'...
You are going to do some staff work? OMG YOU FACIST!!!!!!!!!1111 You better not be haxx0ring any bitter old men.
pack3tg0st
06-11-2010, 03:56 PM
Back... now with 100% more Poll! (up top)
and yah... I created a poll by SHEER admin fiat!!!!
or should I have held a poll to see if I should make a poll on this subject?
Keep every one here, free for all. That's the purpose.
People should quite trying to be reasonable and let it go. rumble.
Hazelnut
06-11-2010, 03:56 PM
Time Out.
Ban at Strike Three.
Sokrates
06-11-2010, 03:57 PM
free for all and just be douchbags to each other. yay.
pack3tg0st
06-11-2010, 03:58 PM
Time Out.
Ban at Strike Three.
lol I don't think we'll ever be able to ban... that precedent was set too long ago, and is too deeply entrenched in the culture of amkon.
Snow Crash
06-11-2010, 03:59 PM
Back... now with 100% more Poll! (up top)
and yah... I created a poll by SHEER admin fiat!!!!
or should I have held a poll to see if I should make a poll on this subject?
Don't be crazy. A poll isn't a poll unless IEF made an initial half dozen threads about making a poll to determine whether or not to make a poll. Plus, one of the options has to concern IEF's dick.
Hazelnut
06-11-2010, 03:59 PM
lol I don't think we'll ever be able to ban... that precedent was set too long ago, and is too deeply entrenched in the culture of amkon.
Fine!
:grin:
Sokrates
06-11-2010, 04:01 PM
its bullshit if people cared they would put wankers on ignore. they don't care. why should i? the only people that put anyone on ignore are the ones that are crying persecution. what does that say?
Hazelnut
06-11-2010, 04:01 PM
Fuck it. Those two are going on ignore right now.
Chorlton needs to cut the pedophile talk out.
Sokrates
06-11-2010, 04:36 PM
BE needs to quit fucking turning every thread into the borg one into am ego spank. everyones threads are important.
Hazelnut
06-11-2010, 07:50 PM
Here is the POLL
http://cdn0.knowyourmeme.com/i/19268/original/bump.jpg
WhispersInTheDark
06-11-2010, 08:37 PM
I have previously suggested a padded cell environment for any member who is voted into it by ten members or more. One month solitary or exclusive company of other inductees...
MrPenny
06-11-2010, 08:38 PM
I vote the fuckin' eye flashy cat goes in the sandbox.
And uses it.
:D:D
Infinite`Eternal`Forever
06-11-2010, 08:39 PM
Blah.
pack3tg0st
06-11-2010, 09:05 PM
I have previously suggested a padded cell environment for any member who is voted into it by ten members or more. One month solitary or exclusive company of other inductees...
jeez... thats way harsher than I would come up with lol
I have previously suggested a padded cell environment for any member who is voted into it by ten members or more. One month solitary or exclusive company of other inductees...
I agree with this one "slaughter house" for a month after a vote of ten members . . .
We vote ten members in to be our judge jury henchmen . . . :D . . . this could be fun I like . . . . :carrot:
WhispersInTheDark
06-11-2010, 09:31 PM
I kind of saw it more as a spontaneous kangaroo court, like suddenly running a ten-person train on someone annoying, throwing them in the cell and throwing away the key for a month... me not a believer in western judiciary balanced scales of blind justice model much... it's just featherbedding for the non-humans who make up the legal system.
pack3tg0st
06-11-2010, 09:39 PM
hahahaha the two 'other' votes...
Chorlton and a sock lol
fuckin' socks...
Socks don't get votes.
MrPenny
06-11-2010, 09:40 PM
Socks are fuckin' stupid.
FancyFree
06-11-2010, 09:43 PM
Socks are fuckin' stupid.
co-sign to the "enth" degree
Infinite`Eternal`Forever
06-11-2010, 09:47 PM
Socks are fuckin' stupid.
Are you paying attention parox?
Snow Crash
06-11-2010, 09:48 PM
hahahaha the two 'other' votes...
Chorlton and a sock lol
fuckin' socks...
Socks don't get votes.
Haha... desperado tactics from CHorly eh...
pack3tg0st
06-11-2010, 09:51 PM
Are you paying attention parox?
Parox doesn't have socks anymore.
Last week he had me merge them all into his main account.
FancyFree
06-11-2010, 09:52 PM
thatta boy, Parox!
pack3tg0st
06-11-2010, 09:53 PM
Haha... desperado tactics from CHorly eh...
and he wonders why we don't listen when he said the poll was fail.
Snow Crash
06-11-2010, 09:58 PM
and he wonders why we don't listen when he said the poll was fail.
Well, does anyone aside from BE listen to him ANYWAY?
Oh, right.... TT...
Infinite`Eternal`Forever
06-11-2010, 10:00 PM
Well, does anyone aside from BE listen to him ANYWAY?
Oh, right.... TT...
Hahahahaahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a.
http://knowyourmeme.com/i/000/048/783/original/a_winner_is_you.jpg
Hazelnut
06-11-2010, 10:07 PM
I have previously suggested a padded cell environment for any member who is voted into it by ten members or more. One month solitary or exclusive company of other inductees...
My mass programing says, "I'm lovin it."
FancyFree
06-11-2010, 10:50 PM
lmao Hazel. I think you are brilliant.
MissA
06-11-2010, 10:52 PM
Temp ban and three strikes you're out out.
MrPenny
06-11-2010, 10:55 PM
Temp ban and three strikes you're out out.
Think of it as the "slow" member of the tribe.
Can't hunt, doesn't know an edible root from a turd, and insists on crapping wherever it pleases. Add to that the inability to keep up with the rest of the tribe.....
Do you think the tribe keeps that one around? Not me. If it was my decision, the imbecile that threatens the health of the tribe is left tied to a friggin' tree.....
MissA
06-11-2010, 10:58 PM
I agree, Mr Penny, but without the three strikes people would be upset that someone was gone. Three strikes and you can said they had other chances.
Why no just kill the poor dude. It would give a sense of power. Also rip out the heart and consume it. Pretend he is a buffalo.
FancyFree
06-11-2010, 10:59 PM
Temp ban and three strikes you're out out.
I like it.
pack3tg0st
06-11-2010, 11:01 PM
I agree, Mr Penny, but without the three strikes people would be upset that someone was gone. Three strikes and you can said they had other chances.
You mean so a really bad troll gets to put us through 4 hellishly aweful drama events first?
Just so we ban them, and they go off screaming to high heaven that we ban?
naw.
IMHO, they aren't worth the distinct honor of being banned from amkon...
MissA
06-11-2010, 11:01 PM
Why no just kill the poor dude. It would give a sense of power. Also rip out the heart and consume it. Pretend he is a buffalo.
HP, you are my new president.
MrPenny
06-11-2010, 11:04 PM
I agree, Mr Penny, but without the three strikes people would be upset that someone was gone. Three strikes and you can said they had other chances.
Yeah....that is to be expected. Of course, the unspoken subject of this thread has had several plate appearances....and has struck out every time. It's like the idiot on the team that gets to bat in a game with a foregone conclusion in the ninth inning....."ah, God love him....look how hard he tries."
Whatever is done, can't be applied in a retroactive manner. It needs to be documented and made clear that these are the standards from this point forward. And then adhered to.
And proactively.....shut up with the "free speech" shit....not you MissA, but the inevitable shrieking that occurs when this topic comes up.
MrPenny
06-11-2010, 11:05 PM
Why no just kill the poor dude. It would give a sense of power. Also rip out the heart and consume it. Pretend he is a buffalo.
You left out, "gang rape the fuckin' corpse".
That's burtal.
FancyFree
06-11-2010, 11:07 PM
I have to agree with this. When it threatens the site in general i think there should be some sort of consequences for people's actions. You can't just sit there and say, "well, this is amkon, home of unlimited free speech without consequences and no banning" while the site implodes upon itself.
Snow Crash
06-11-2010, 11:07 PM
You left out, "run a train on the fuckin' corpse".
That's burtal.
Fixt
MissA
06-11-2010, 11:08 PM
I have to agree with this. When it threatens the site in general i think there should be some sort of consequences for people's actions. You can't just sit there and say, "well, this is amkon, home of unlimited free speech without consequences and no banning" while the site implodes upon itself.
I would agree, but everyone else can just ignore with their eyes.
God I love mead.
It almost tastes like a fizzy beer.
Infinite`Eternal`Forever
06-11-2010, 11:10 PM
Fuck all this banning shit. Let's not become like absolute total shit.
pack3tg0st
06-11-2010, 11:13 PM
I have to agree with this. When it threatens the site in general i think there should be some sort of consequences for people's actions. You can't just sit there and say, "well, this is amkon, home of unlimited free speech without consequences and no banning" while the site implodes upon itself.
Well, I'd tend to think that if skunk was served with papers and had to lawyer up to defend his ass in court against a legal (not civil) liability, it would be fixed according to what the lawyer suggests...
that might be deletion, bannings etc...
so IMHO, in rare instances will we have to do something to 'protect the site' itself... BE has probably come closest to causing real damage...
But, I don't think a 'ban' is going to happen in any sort of other scenario than the one I mentioned.
MissA
06-11-2010, 11:13 PM
Fuck all this banning shit. Let's not become like absolute total shit.
There are forums that ban that aren't absolute total shit. One the plus side they have threads that actually stay on target.
No banning on Amkon . . . but a torture room for a month, a month a long time . . .:D
Infinite`Eternal`Forever
06-11-2010, 11:15 PM
There are forums that ban that aren't absolute total shit. One the plus side they have threads that actually stay on target.
Why do people act like they can't overlook a fuckstain trolling in their thread and just continue to respond to people that are only interested in the topic?
Infinite`Eternal`Forever
06-11-2010, 11:16 PM
No banning on Amkon . . . but a torture room for a month, a month a long time . . .:D
Hahaha. How bout solitary confinement? The poster would have to be forced to post in a forum where only they can post. Thus forcing them to have to talk to theirselfs all the time.
Sounds like a pretty good idea actually.
There are forums that ban that aren't absolute total shit. One the plus side they have threads that actually stay on target.
If that what people want they should join thoses site's then. . . we don't ban . . . its the only rule we've ever had . . . :D
pack3tg0st
06-11-2010, 11:18 PM
Hahaha. How bout solitary confinement? The poster would have to be forced to post in a forum where only they can post. Thus forcing them to have to talk to theirselfs all the time.
Sounds like a pretty good idea actually.
we already got one. The sandbox.
except anyone can post there if they want...
The person in time-out can read the forums all they want as well.. they can only post in the sandbox as long as they are in 'timeout'...
I've only sent one person there... it was a sock... and I'm sure this person would rather have me send their sock to the sandbox than out who the sock is :D
pack3tg0st
06-11-2010, 11:18 PM
If that what people want they should join thoses site's then. . . we don't ban . . . its the only rule we've ever had . . . :D
It actually isn't a rule lol
the only rules we have are no gore/no porn.
our T&C's are pretty legally indefensible lol
Infinite`Eternal`Forever
06-11-2010, 11:19 PM
I've only sent one person there... it was a sock... and I'm sure this person would rather have me send their sock to the sandbox than out who the sock is :D
You should have done that though man. You would've let them know that you weren't playing.
MrPenny
06-11-2010, 11:20 PM
our T&C's are pretty legally indefensible lol
I'm guessing the site host hasn't really read Amkon's T&C.
FancyFree
06-11-2010, 11:22 PM
Well if not a ban then something. Which is why i think the sandbox is a good idea.
MissA
06-11-2010, 11:23 PM
If that what people want they should join thoses site's then. . . we don't ban . . . its the only rule we've ever had . . . :D
I'm not advocating a ban I'm advocating people do what a community would do, but I'm also defending ATS for at least keeping threads on track. They are dicks, but they also run a neat ship.
Infinite`Eternal`Forever
06-11-2010, 11:25 PM
they also run a neat ship.
No. They really don't.
WhispersInTheDark
06-11-2010, 11:28 PM
They are dicks, but they also run a neat ship.
I agree with IEF.
AnalWarts is a complete abomination of a useless fucking mess, with the sole objective of driving traffic. There are no redeeming features whatsoever.
MrPenny
06-11-2010, 11:30 PM
There are no redeeming features whatsoever.
The site "backgrounds" are pretty cool.
Snow Crash
06-11-2010, 11:30 PM
They are dicks, but they also run a neat ship.
Trust me, those guys are corporate-facist wannabe scumbags. Take it from someone who spent a short while on the inside.
MrPenny
06-11-2010, 11:31 PM
Aside from all this other shit.....can we start a campaign to outlaw "flashy eyed cats"?
WhispersInTheDark
06-11-2010, 11:31 PM
The site "backgrounds" are pretty cool.
Yeah, but the "conspiracy chicks" are ugly molls.
MissA
06-11-2010, 11:31 PM
I agree with IEF.
AnalWarts is a complete abomination of a useless fucking mess, with the sole obective of driving traffic. There are no redeeming features whatsoever.
I don't know the Spiegel ads on the sides are kind of nice.
MrPenny
06-11-2010, 11:32 PM
Yeah, but the "conspiracy chicks" are ugly molls.
You have some really high standards. That's cool.....I'm a little less picky.
WhispersInTheDark
06-11-2010, 11:32 PM
LOL.
Infinite`Eternal`Forever
06-11-2010, 11:35 PM
The only good thing I can say about ATS is that there's a high possibility of meeting a few broads that will show your their ta ta's. ;)
WhispersInTheDark
06-11-2010, 11:36 PM
Yep, had a few assorted tittie showings myself. Average.
MrPenny
06-11-2010, 11:37 PM
Yep, had a few assorted tittie showings myself. Average.
Cool....show us your average titties then.
WhispersInTheDark
06-11-2010, 11:49 PM
Unfortunately I have been only the viewer, and my own mammaries are sub-average, for my nipples seem to have not been designed to deliver any milk. They seem somehow... superfluous... an oddly liquid word for something that is 'dry'.
Hazelnut
06-12-2010, 12:11 AM
lmao Hazel. I think you are brilliant.
I'm happy when someone gets my jokes. :D:D
Paroxysm
06-12-2010, 06:25 AM
Are you paying attention parox?
Fuck outta here you piece of shit!
skunk
06-14-2010, 11:15 AM
What defines a troll exactly?
I'm just gonna post this shit in every thread.
http://amkon.net/contemplating-t27318.html?p=444408
im not really sure why anyone is disgruntled about two things.
1. moderation, (perceived or otherwise).
2. the content.
first off when amkon began it was only a chat room with about a dozen of our favorite threads that were either CT or alternative in nature. its always been more of a community chat room except the discussions were often topics that you wouldnt normally chat about with folk in RL.
its never been a full blown CT forum like ats or glp or stfu or anywhere else for that matter, we never wanted it to be like them.
second, the whole point of the past couple of years was for the forum to reach a point in its existence that there would be no need whatsoever for moderators or admins to become involved in anything other than site maintenance and or removing gore or pron that some drive by troll might post.
thats it.
no bannings, no moving people into time outs, no forcing people to post content that the admins want or that other members want, no steering discussion.
if you dont like what someone says then dont read their posts or threads. if you dont like that aamkon isnt serious enough then post your serious shit at ats (lol). if you think amkon is too serious then post your shit at davidicke forums (hehe).
get over it, it is what it is, i love it just the way it is.
i can come here and talk about any damn thing i like, i can talk with whoever i like, i dont have to mind my manners, i dont have to pretend to like someone else or what they are saying, i can be an asshole or a nice guy.
stop fucking with it, it ain't broken.
WhispersInTheDark
06-14-2010, 09:41 PM
What defines a troll exactly?
An oft-asked, ne'er-answered question... except with images of 1970s'-80s toy dolls, or internet cartoons.