View Full Version : Should politicians who vote for war be forced to send their children?
skunk
04-19-2010, 12:53 AM
Politicians have plenty of balls when it comes to sending other people's children off to war, but they'd be singing a different tune if their own children were forced to go.
I say if you vote for war, or support the war at all, your children must go as well.
Bush's twins never went, but he was/is an adamant supporter of the war on terror, the war in Iraq, and the war in Afghanistan (Pakistan, Yemen, etc etc but those are covered under the greater jurisdiction of the war of terror, I mean, war on terror).
Sign the Petition of Redress. Either the Bush Kids Put Their Lives on the Line for George's "Noble War" or the Troops Come Home. (http://www.buzzflash.com/editorial/05/08/edi05061.html)
Weekly "Bush Twins in Uniform" Watch (http://opovet.blogspot.com/2006/06/weekly-bush-twins-in-uniform-watch_26.html)
skunk
04-19-2010, 12:54 AM
Or better yet, send the politicians who voted for war. And they can't sit around in the green zone with their thumbs up their asses, they have to fight on the front line.
Snow Crash
04-19-2010, 12:57 AM
Fuck yes. Put those fuckers on the frontline and watch if daddy is so eager to send them out. Make the Bush twins patrol Sadr City imo.
Jackinthebox
04-19-2010, 12:58 AM
Why should they be forced to send their children? Don't their children have any rights? What if their FULL GROWN ADULT children even think their parent is an asshat?
skunk
04-19-2010, 01:00 AM
Their parents would reconsider voting for the war in the first place if they had to send their own children, don't you think?
When it's other people's children, they have no problem voting to send them to war.
If they had some connection to the people they sent, I guarantee they wouldn't be itching for war as often.
I see this as a deterrent.
century
04-19-2010, 02:16 AM
TJD73amKfQU
Jackinthebox
04-19-2010, 02:19 AM
Their parents would reconsider voting for the war in the first place if they had to send their own children, don't you think?
When it's other people's children, they have no problem voting to send them to war.
If they had some connection to the people they sent, I guarantee they wouldn't be itching for was as often.
I see this as a deterrent.
If you go out and murder someone, should your kid have to go to prison for it?
The problem is not that they are the kids of politicians anyway. Do you think the sons and daughters of JP Moran execs, AIG execs, Haliburton execs go marching off to war?
This "sins of the father" shit makes me wonder why we ever bothered to seperate from England in the first place.
skunk
04-19-2010, 02:16 PM
Send the kids of the Halliburton and JP Morgan execs too. They want war, well they'll get it.
FancyFree
04-19-2010, 02:39 PM
I voted NO, i don't think children should have to suffer because of their parents idiocracy. Instead, i think those politicians, THEMSELVES, should go to war.
skunk
04-19-2010, 02:40 PM
Or better yet, send the politicians who voted for war. And they can't sit around in the green zone with their thumbs up their asses, they have to fight on the front line.
I said that too jess :D. Why not send their whole family, grandparents and all?
FancyFree
04-19-2010, 02:43 PM
I said that too jess :D. Why not send their whole family, grandparents and all?
oh , oopsie, sorry, i replied before i read anybody else's posts. lol
spank me......please.
skunk
04-19-2010, 03:07 PM
No worries.