PDA

View Full Version : The other hominids.



Bitchkoma
01-04-2010, 12:28 AM
What Happened to the Hominids Who Were Smarter Than Us? (http://discovermagazine.com/2009/the-brain-2/28-what-happened-to-hominids-who-were-smarter-than-us)

The Boskops had big eyes, child-like faces, and an average intelligence of around 150, making them geniuses among Homo sapiens.

A sketched reconstruction if the Boskop skull
done in 1918. Shaded areas depict recovered bone.

In the autumn of 1913, two farmers were arguing about hominid skull fragments they had uncovered while digging a drainage ditch. The location was Boskop, a small town about 200 miles inland from the east coast of South Africa.

These Afrikaner farmers, to their lasting credit, had the presence of mind to notice that there was something distinctly odd about the bones. They brought the find to Frederick W. Fitz Simons, director of the Port Elizabeth Museum, in a small town at the tip of South Africa. The scientific community of South Africa was small, and before long the skull came to the attention of S. H. Haughton, one of the country’s few formally trained paleontologists. He reported his findings at a 1915 meeting of the Royal Society of South Africa. “The cranial capacity must have been very large,” he said, and “calculation by the method of Broca gives a minimum figure of 1,832 cc [cubic centimeters].” The Boskop skull, it would seem, housed a brain perhaps 25 percent or more larger than our own.

The idea that giant-brained people were not so long ago walking the dusty plains of South Africa was sufficiently shocking to draw in the luminaries back in England. Two of the most prominent anatomists of the day, both experts in the reconstruction of skulls, weighed in with opinions generally supportive of Haughton’s conclusions.

The Scottish scientist Robert Broom reported that “we get for the corrected cranial capacity of the Boskop skull the very remarkable figure of 1,980 cc.” Remarkable indeed: These measures say that the distance from Boskop to humans is greater than the distance between humans and their Homo erectus predecessors.

It's a 3 page article, good read. In summary the Boskops disappeared from the fossil record around 12,000 BC. They were thought to have an average IQ of 150. They had large heads and large eyes. They completely disappeared after the last ice age.

Anyone else thinking what I'm thinking?

boycotteverything
01-04-2010, 12:33 AM
Anyone else thinking what I'm thinking? well let's see now. it's gotta either be food or sex. i vote sex. right?

mojo
01-04-2010, 12:36 AM
neandertal cranial capacity was also much larger than ours. latest figures put their demise at around 28000 bp.
hadnt heard of these before BK thanks for the heads up.

boycotteverything
01-04-2010, 12:37 AM
oh- and don't forget about dolphins.

boycotteverything
01-04-2010, 12:39 AM
and of course there's also this guy to consider-

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn12301-man-with-tiny-brain-shocks-doctors.html

mojo
01-04-2010, 12:43 AM
and of course there's also this guy to consider-

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn12301-man-with-tiny-brain-shocks-doctors.html

lol, thats actually pretty amazing.

boycotteverything
01-04-2010, 12:54 AM
i guess it disproves the relationship between brain size and intelligence.

Foxtrot Oscar
01-04-2010, 01:26 AM
To be blunt. It's not the size, but what you do with it. Right BE?

Big head. Not so much balance, maybe a little on the slow side - motion wise.

Along comes HomoHomo Small and faster. Wham Bamm... Dinner is served!

or

What BK is really thinking.

It was a couple of greys that crashed.

Fox

Cogburn
01-04-2010, 01:28 AM
i guess it disproves the relationship between brain size and intelligence.

Except that it does.

Intelligence tests showed the man had an IQ of 75, below the average score of 100 but not considered mentally retarded or disabled.

"The whole brain was reduced - frontal, parietal, temporal and occipital lobes - on both left and right sides. These regions control motion, sensibility, language, vision, audition, and emotional and cognitive functions," Feuillet told New Scientist.

Foxtrot Oscar
01-04-2010, 01:29 AM
He looses 75% of his noodles, but only 25% of his functioning ability.

Nice

Fox

Bitchkoma
01-04-2010, 07:45 AM
Yeah I was kind of thinking that maybe the aliens are actually these folk. They left Earth sometime 12k years ago or something.

boycotteverything
01-04-2010, 09:16 AM
...or maybe they never left at all

MissA
01-04-2010, 09:22 AM
They only found one fossil remain, yes? Maybe even a few.

The problem with paleontology and anthropological archaeology is that there are so few items that can be construed as "evidence" prior to making claims about a "what". If they found thousands of these then I might believe it represented a thriving earth culture. As is, how do we know this wasn't a Roswell type incident of a crash and the body found and buried?

boycotteverything
01-04-2010, 09:33 AM
The problem with paleontology and anthropological archaeology is that there are so few items that can be construed as "evidence" prior to making claims about a "what".exactly the problem. the field always involves backwards reasoning (from the particular to the general) with a huge dollop of speculation. but it's still worthwhile.

MissA
01-04-2010, 09:36 AM
Did you know that this is my actual degree field? By the time I got my PhD I was making too much money in my supporting career to call quits, so now I just teach part-time until I have the guts to go full monty.

It is fascinating tho, the things you uncover. Many things you dig up they tell you to put back.

boycotteverything
01-04-2010, 09:55 AM
archaeology was my minor as an undergrad. i spent many years in the lab labeling pot shards and clean skulls with an assortment of dental tools. hahahaha

MissA
01-04-2010, 09:57 AM
You see! This is why I adore you.