View Full Version : Solar warden craft or "Thermal insulation tile" ?
What do you reckon?
http://www.nasaimages.org/luna/servlet/detail/nasaNAS~7~7~45124~148967:Piece-of-thermal-insulation-tile-fl
Cheers,
Yex
Lexion
08-12-2009, 08:20 PM
Tile.
This is posted here, somewhere.
Funny, though.
Lex
Cogburn
08-12-2009, 08:20 PM
No sense of scale.
Is that object 5ft outside the window or half a mile away?
It`s certainly very triangular, reminds me of this one
http://www.ufodigest.com/news/0308/images/eris-triangle.jpg
from here
http://www.ufodigest.com/news/0308/alienpresence.html
Cheers,
Yex
Lexion
08-12-2009, 08:45 PM
As Cog said...
No perspective.
Cool pic, yes.
UFO....in the truest sense,
sure.
Alien...not so much.
Lex
Cogburn
08-12-2009, 08:55 PM
OP pic was from 1986.
All the shuttles have the same tile design.
If the OP pic is a tile, so's the second one.
theeindiee
08-12-2009, 09:22 PM
If you zoom in, the triangle is very rough around the edges... like it was a piece that broke off of something.
Those are actually the same photo, and yes...tile
Edit..my bad...not the same photo
Royal
08-13-2009, 02:12 AM
I thought thermal insulation tile is suppose to be insulated in the shuttle.
Lex- who mentioned aliens? :alien:
and Mur- there you go, jumping to conclusions, "same picture...blah blah!"
That kind of arrogance is what gets you banned from forums :twisted:
seems peculiar to me having two pictures of perfectly triangular black "tiles"
maybe the modus operandi is hiding in plain sight?
cheers,
Yex
Cogburn
08-13-2009, 12:00 PM
Peculiar?
The two shuttles are the same model craft. 22 years after the OP pic we see the same thing.
What you are insinuating is that the worlds largest conspiracy made the mistake of allowing some top secret craft to be filmed by astronauts inside the shuttle.... not once, but twice.
Occam says it's a tile.
Why do you say it is something different? The fact it appeared on a UFO blog?
boycotteverything
08-13-2009, 12:40 PM
That kind of arrogance is what gets you banned from forums that'll frost his ass!
Peculiar?
The two shuttles are the same model craft. 22 years after the OP pic we see the same thing.
What you are insinuating is that the worlds largest conspiracy made the mistake of allowing some top secret craft to be filmed by astronauts inside the shuttle.... not once, but twice.
Occam says it's a tile.
Why do you say it is something different? The fact it appeared on a UFO blog?
The underside is just full of them perfectly triangular matt black tiles, ain`t it?
http://a.abcnews.com/images/Technology/ht_main_tile_inspection_070810_mn.jpg
Cheers,
Yex
Cogburn
08-13-2009, 01:53 PM
If a tile was floating in space we could probably assume that it would be doing so because it was broken, no?
Check out the friction striations on the tiles in the picture you just posted.
Hard to imagine a tile not up to spec cracking diagonally and floating away I guess.
You're smarter than this, dude.
IMO more likely to be one of these
http://www.ufocasebook.com/scotland2002.jpg
Than 2 identically cracked tiles on 2 different missions
cheers,
Yex
pack3tg0st
08-19-2009, 02:52 AM
Wait...
isn't that last triangle one of them SR-91s we discussed?
dunno
I've been drinking
thus, this is most likely a drive by post
Cogburn
08-19-2009, 03:07 AM
IMO more likely to be one of these
Than 2 identically cracked tiles on 2 different missions
cheers,
Yex
Two nearly identically cracked tiles that cracked in two nearly identical ways when placed under nearly identical conditions on two nearly identical space craft?
Yeah... that's exactly what I'm saying.
I'm skeptical of that image because of the graininess and the symmetrical pattern which isn't evidenced in other like photographs. I smell hoax.
Got a source for that?
IMO more likely to be one of these
Than 2 identically cracked tiles on 2 different missions
cheers,
Yex
Two nearly identically cracked tiles that cracked in two nearly identical ways when placed under nearly identical conditions on two nearly identical space craft?
Yeah... that's exactly what I'm saying.
I'm skeptical of that image because of the graininess and the symmetrical pattern which isn't evidenced in other like photographs. I smell hoax.
Got a source for that?
2002-Glasgow, Scotland. The photographer said he took the picture at about 10:00 P.M. in Glasgow, Ayrshire, Scotland. He said: "At around 10pm 2 months ago I was looking out my window (I was actually looking for my cat that had ran out the door) when I saw this strange thing in the sky as soon as I seen it I just grabbed my digital camera and took a picture... after I took the picture I turned round to give the camera to my girlfriend... Looked back and it was gone... There was no noise just total silence. P.S. the pic isn't great my hands were a bit shaky."
Thats all thats on the UFO Casebook page I`m afraid
http://www.ufocasebook.com/triangles.html
cheers,
Yex
boycotteverything
08-19-2009, 01:39 PM
These things have been seen thousands of times by credible witnesses. Klassic debunks don't do them justice.
(I was actually looking for my cat that had ran out the door) Good luck with that!
Cogburn
08-19-2009, 08:27 PM
http://www.ufocasebook.com/triangles.htmlLook at Glasgow in comparison to all the others.... see a difference?
Just because one person fakes a black triangle doesn't mean they are all faked. Looking at the 2009 SC picture in perspective... a new question arises.
The Belgian photos match Wisconsin, Texas, and Louisiana.
PR, SC, New Mexico and Glasgow share nothing in common beyond the triangular shape, not even with each other.
If I were a betting man I'd put my wager on the second group being a collection of hoaxes.
You know what's funny... I live between Vandenburg AFB, Edwards AFB and Port Hueneme... I bet if I showed up with a picture of a black triangle you'd swear I faked it.
I'm not a doubter of the triangle phenomenon. I think it's a 3rd generation craft built from Nazi technology, but I don't have any proof.
I certainly don't think it's aliens and I do think about 50% of the photographs of the craft are complete bullshit.
Lexion
08-19-2009, 08:32 PM
http://i196.photobucket.com/albums/aa20/Lexion07/MVC-047S.jpg
ATS and JR never debunked it.
Yet, it's a real pic.
Of a cell-tower.
Heh.
Cogburn
08-19-2009, 09:10 PM
I thing that this image has been modified to diffuse low light in the background to purposefully deceive investigators.
Even a cell phone camera in low light would have left a trace of the bottom of the light pole. However when reverted to black and white and with the exposure and gamma corrected, the light pole... and the entire background... is missing.
http://i31.tinypic.com/msk49g.png
I'd put money that no one at ATS or JR had the sense to ask for a picture of the scene in daylight so they could compare such features and prove my theory correct.
Lexion
08-19-2009, 10:50 PM
Pic has not been altered, in any way.
Taken about 5 AM.
I'd put money that no one at ATS or JR had the sense to ask for a picture of the scene in daylight so they could compare such features and prove my theory correct.
Correct.
They never asked.
I never offered.
Lex
Cogburn
08-19-2009, 11:22 PM
What was the model camera and what settings did you use?
If you've done nothing to the image other than upload it to ImageBucket....
Could you attach the out-of-the-camera image to this thread?
EDIT: For the record, I guess you see what I mean when I slam JRef all the time. A bunch of internet-based-know-it-all-smarty-pants without a lick of common sense or basic investigative acumen. Yes, I was wrong about why the background is washed out... but the mystery still would have been resolved with a daylight image.
Lexion
08-20-2009, 10:13 AM
Older digital camera.
I'll get the specs this afternoon
and see if I can dig out the
orig. disc.