View Full Version : Moon Landing Hoax
pack3tg0st
07-20-2009, 12:48 AM
Why are the people who believe the moon landings were hoaxes suprisingly quiet these days?
its wierd...
Usually the Lear crowd is pretty vocal...
but suddenly, its as if they're all taking a break away from screaming "NAZA LIES!"
Oh wait... I figured it out
http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/news/uploads/five_sites_anot.png
WarlordZeroOne
07-20-2009, 03:08 AM
Pack,here's what i found today "Moon Landing a Hoax" it says 25% of the British people believe it to be a Hoax via a Poll,at the end of the day its only what some people THINK.This Moon landing is attracting media attention,interesting. so here is the source.
www.aol.com (http://www.aol.com)
25% believe moon landings were hoax
Last Updated: Sunday, 19 July 2009, 03:00 GMT- Search: Briton moon landing
A quarter of Britons believe the Apollo moon landings were a hoax, according to a poll conducted this month.
Eleven of the 1009 people surveyed thought Buzz Lightyear was the first person on the Moon.
pack3tg0st
07-20-2009, 03:24 AM
Well I konw there's a growing segment out there that believe that... I was just wondering why the main players (John Lear etc) aren't out screaming their crap from the rooftops again...
Eleven of the 1009 people surveyed thought Buzz Lightyear was the first person on the Moon.
Now THAT is troubling...
WarlordZeroOne
07-20-2009, 03:31 AM
Morning Pack, Lear and co, might not want egg all over their faces, if it turns out to be true,and if the shit hits the fan nobody is spared. lol
Watcher-In-The-Shadows
07-20-2009, 04:28 AM
I think it's largely because they have been definitively proven wrong and are busy working on the next BS line to try.
I guess you can say "knocked back on the heels" more or less in fight terms.
Foxtrot Oscar
07-20-2009, 09:28 AM
Oh come on... We all know one of the thousands of people/things living on the moon put that there for the camera.
Fuck if you look really closely you can see it's made of Balsa and no more nails!
Fox
Cogburn
07-20-2009, 09:32 AM
Well I konw there's a growing segment out there that believe that... I was just wondering why the main players (John Lear etc) aren't out screaming their crap from the rooftops again...
Eleven of the 1009 people surveyed thought Buzz Lightyear was the first person on the Moon.
Now THAT is troubling...1% of that 25%, I'm sure.
Does it mean that there's significant evidence that the moon landing was hoaxed or does it mean 1 in 4 Britons are morons?
skunk
07-20-2009, 12:28 PM
We found the soul catcher!
century
07-20-2009, 07:34 PM
Right at 2 min. she says the astronauts breathed moon dust in and I was just curious if anyone could tell me how the hell they were able to accomplish this. Or if she knows what she is talking about.
h]70fKG6a7Fo0h]
Lexion
07-20-2009, 07:41 PM
Tracked into the LEM, maybe ?
No clue,
Lex
century
07-20-2009, 08:11 PM
Oh yes they had to jettison their suits, no separate chamber to de-pressurize
r]I6jq-igwwGEr]
pack3tg0st
07-20-2009, 08:21 PM
wonder how many millions were left behind...
Would be awesome if the next moon mission lands near Serenity Base, and picks up the old ones...
Would be awesome to put in the smithsonian.
century
07-20-2009, 08:44 PM
wonder how many millions were left behind....
Millions :?:
Watcher-In-The-Shadows
07-20-2009, 09:05 PM
Oh come on... We all know one of the thousands of people/things living on the moon put that there for the camera.
Fuck if you look really closely you can see it's made of Balsa and no more nails!
Fox
*cracks whip*
BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARD WITH YOU!
:lol:
WarlordZeroOne
07-21-2009, 04:11 AM
Yes and the next landing will be Live and in Full color with Moving cams on their space helmets,will not be able to ARGUE that landing was fake. lol
Why are the people who believe the moon landings were hoaxes suprisingly quiet these days?
its wierd...
Usually the Lear crowd is pretty vocal...
but suddenly, its as if they're all taking a break away from screaming "NAZA LIES!"
Oh wait... I figured it out
http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/news/uploads/five_sites_anot.png
The Lear crowd?.......wasnt aware there was one Pac, have I missed something?...........
and what is it you have figured out?
you crack me up you Apollo moon landing "lobby" group...........youre as bad as the conspiracy theorists with ya grainy black and white photos....... :lol:
pack3tg0st
07-21-2009, 10:07 AM
wonder how many millions were left behind....
Millions :?:
Millions of dollars...
pack3tg0st
07-21-2009, 10:11 AM
The Lear crowd?.......wasnt aware there was one Pac, have I missed something?...........
and what is it you have figured out?
Yah, there is a Lear crowd...
They're the ones who look at moon pictures and see Soul Catchers...
They also see signs of civilization on the moon...
I didn't figure anything out Kiwi... Those pictures are the Apollo moon landings fresh off the LROC...
The arrows point to where the LEM still sits...
Apollo 14 is the coolest one... you can see the trail from the Astronauts walking back and forth between the LEM and where they placed their scientific instruments...
pack3tg0st
07-21-2009, 10:52 AM
Wait!
Poast # 1701
http://i217.photobucket.com/albums/cc44/devosspudboy/USSEnterpriseNCC1701A.jpg
Yah, I'm a fuckin' nerd...
The Lear crowd?.......wasnt aware there was one Pac, have I missed something?...........
and what is it you have figured out?
Yah, there is a Lear crowd...
They're the ones who look at moon pictures and see Soul Catchers...
They also see signs of civilization on the moon...
I didn't figure anything out Kiwi... Those pictures are the Apollo moon landings fresh off the LROC...
The arrows point to where the LEM still sits...
Apollo 14 is the coolest one... you can see the trail from the Astronauts walking back and forth between the LEM and where they placed their scientific instruments...
John's a late comer to the game, by quite a few hundred years........but enjoys the attention Im sure, must pull the crowds on the lecture circuit, :twisted:
What sort of camera on board the LROC ?..........must be one of those cute little Kodak " Happy-Snapper's" when you know that 50 years ago there was equipment in use that could resolve a news-paper headline from a couple of miles up ? not to mention of course there is no atmosphere to distort the view from above the moon?
You take the same liberty as the nay-sayers, but you back it up with the official :pound: explanation , its a non-descript grainy black and white, thats all it is, AT THIS STAGE :? ..........when/if the evidence, irrefutable,.... is produced, I will gladly run naked through the halls of Amkon with a lunar lander tattooed on my fore-head :roll:
somewhere here I have a doc published by NASA of all the anomalous sightings by astronomers of lights etc seen on and around the Moon, dates from around 1100ad -1966,..... interesting read, hundreds of reports, would like to find some sort of paer as to what they say are the surface conditions found versus what has been observed in the past....anyway, as far as Im concerned the jury is still out......cant wait!! 8)
Why are the people who believe the moon landings were hoaxes suprisingly quiet these days?
its wierd...
why bother?.....I join in, your lurking I see, so's cog, you get what ya ask for and then wont come and play?
Cogburn
07-21-2009, 08:50 PM
Because we know it's only half-hearted.
Tough to debunk the LRO images without claiming a massive, unprovable conspiracy to obscure the truth from humanity.
The "greatest conspiracy ever" was convincing the public that our government agencies were anything more that morons, bumblefucks, and clowns.
Throw in a couple of slide-rules and pocket protectors and you get a Moon landing.
pack3tg0st
07-21-2009, 09:18 PM
Why are the people who believe the moon landings were hoaxes suprisingly quiet these days?
its wierd...
why bother?.....I join in, your lurking I see, so's cog, you get what ya ask for and then wont come and play?
Hrm?
I haven't been at my computer... my browsers were even closed...
anyway, let me catch up...
pack3tg0st
07-21-2009, 09:37 PM
John's a late comer to the game, by quite a few hundred years........but enjoys the attention Im sure, must pull the crowds on the lecture circuit, :twisted:
Who invented "Soul catchers?" I thought it was John...
anyway, if he didn't invent that, than he's really got nothing original, and just stole shit from others...
What sort of camera on board the LROC ?..........must be one of those cute little Kodak " Happy-Snapper's" when you know that 50 years ago there was equipment in use that could resolve a news-paper headline from a couple of miles up ? not to mention of course there is no atmosphere to distort the view from above the moon?
[offsite=http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/EPO/LROC/lroc.php:2x6anhrx]LROC consists of two Narrow Angle Cameras (NACs) to provide 0.5 meter-scale panchromatic images over a 5 km swath, a Wide Angle Camera (WAC) to provide images at a scale of 100 meters/pixel in seven color bands over a 60 km swath, and a Sequence and Compressor System (SCS) supporting data acquisition for both cameras. LROC is a modified version of the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiters ConTeXt Camera (CTX) and MARs Color Imager (MARCI) provided by Malin Space Science Systems (MSSS) in San Diego, CA.[/offsite:2x6anhrx]
The moon DOES indeed have an atmosphere... its just not what you think... but, I think that will lead us off topic.
You take the same liberty as the nay-sayers, but you back it up with the official :pound: explanation , its a non-descript grainy black and white, thats all it is, AT THIS STAGE :? ..........
There are the photos ya know... but besides that..
I'm sure you're an expert, or know an expert who can explain what types of cameras can withstand the G's associated with launch, the magnetic interference from the Earth's magnetic field, the Solar and Cosmic radiation (which our magnetosphere protects us from)... and still be able to compress high resolution photograph into a manageable size, and transmit files similtaniously.
Now once you figure all that out... Remember, NASA doesn't even have "cutting edge" technology anymore...
when/if the evidence, irrefutable,.... is produced,
What you mean is evidence that you will accept... I could show you all the proof in the world... and you'll claim Naza trickery!
I will gladly run naked through the halls of Amkon with a lunar lander tattooed on my fore-head :roll:
Thats an Image to remember lol
somewhere here I have a doc published by NASA of all the anomalous sightings by astronomers of lights etc seen on and around the Moon, dates from around 1100ad -1966,..... interesting read, hundreds of reports, would like to find some sort of paer as to what they say are the surface conditions found versus what has been observed in the past....anyway, as far as Im concerned the jury is still out......cant wait!! 8)
Yah, they discovered a lot about those in the past few years... there are two diff types if I can remember right... one of em wasn't really a light, but a plum of dust that would shoot like a gyser every now and again...
But still... not proof of civilization.
edit: fixed syntax for quotes
Cogburn
07-21-2009, 09:41 PM
... and before anyone says anything about geologic activity on the Moon ...
We don't know what the tidal forces of the Earth and the Sun do to the Moon. It could cause an expansion and contraction that simulates geologic activity, resulting in the TLPs.
Because we know it's only half-hearted.
Tough to debunk the LRO images without claiming a massive, unprovable conspiracy to obscure the truth from humanity.
The "greatest conspiracy ever" was convincing the public that our government agencies were anything more that morons, bumblefucks, and clowns.
Throw in a couple of slide-rules and pocket protectors and you get a Moon landing.
half-hearted?....shit man, this is the greatest show on earth, whatever the outcome :w00t:
and its easy to debunk a few grainy NASA shots, why, you yourself have been doing it for years :wink:
dont understand point num 3 :?
Who invented "Soul catchers?" I thought it was John...
anyway, if he didn't invent that, than he's really got nothing original, and just stole shit from others...
American Indian I think pac, sure its been in other cultures, youre right, nothing new
The moon DOES indeed have an atmosphere... its just not what you think... but, I think that will lead us off topic.
aware of that,........and its Amkon, ya cant go off topic :)
I'm sure you're an expert, or know an expert who can explain what types of cameras can withstand the G's associated with launch, the magnetic interference from the Earth's magnetic field, the Solar and Cosmic radiation (which our magnetosphere protects us from)... and still be able to compress high resolution photograph into a manageable size, and transmit files similtaniously.
Now once you figure all that out... Remember, NASA doesn't even have "cutting edge" technology anymore...
the launch g's didnt seem to be a problem for all the LEO shots taken over the years, Geminii etc...nor tghe A17 stuff :| was watching a clip through the Nat Geo site last night, interviewing the old geezer that developed a lot of the imaging gear,..I find I find...........NASA does have the cutting edge gear, remember they are a military outfit, they are not allowed to play with it in public, thats all :roll:
What you mean is evidence that you will accept... I could show you all the proof in the world... and you'll claim Naza trickery!
no mate, not at all, just something a bit more definitive than what has been posted, few grainy pics.....
Im just waiting to be convinced :)
Thats an Image to remember lol
you better hope Im right!................scary :arg:
... and before anyone says anything about geologic activity on the Moon ...
We don't know what the tidal forces of the Earth and the Sun do to the Moon. It could cause an expansion and contraction that simulates geologic activity, resulting in the TLPs.
thought that would have been a "must" to find out, before sending a gaggle of your finest onto its surface :?
torbjon
07-21-2009, 11:20 PM
Oh yes they had to jettison their suits, no separate chamber to de-pressurize
o]I6jq-igwwGEo]
well, lookit dat... the doppelgangers tossed the hacked up body parts out the door before coming to earth to conquer us.
well, lookit dat... the doppelgangers tossed the hacked up body parts out the door before coming to earth to conquer us.
all the unknowns involved,.......and you just chuck your shit out the door? no fear of a bounce back damaging any part of your one shot escape vehicle?????????? no possibillity of a piece of crap being dislodged and jamming up part of the device?......the razor sharp dust particle cloud that would have been stirred up?, a bit sloppy when you consider the entire effort put into the program (Apollo) ...."hey Buzz, you wanna keep this ?........"nah fuckit, chuck it out the door"
pack3tg0st
07-22-2009, 01:32 AM
LOL if any of those scenarios happened... they would have been dead anyway...
They had to jettison weight of anything they didn't expressly need to get them back...
They picked up a shitload of moonrocks...
They picked up a shitload of moonrocks...
yeah I bet,.....a rocking-horse- shitload :alien: