Cogburn
07-06-2009, 09:08 PM
Could use a hand from the SERPO / Disclosure Project crowd on this one, will save me hours of research. The end result might be insightful, might not.
When I approach a conspiracy, I focus on the people and not the events or "facts". People create conspiracies, not things or information. This is either done intentionally through misrepresentation or unintentionally either by carelessness or by being deceived personally.
After watching a video posted in this thread (http://www.amkon.net/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=109374#p109374), and witnessing the subject of the video make several references to Philip Corso's book as being a primary motivation for research, I found myself asking the following questions.
* How incestuous is the UFOlogy community surrounding the investigation of government documentation of UFOs and aliens?
* What people keep cropping up time and time again as either sources or "inspiration" for research?
* How many times to the agree/disagree and on what points?
An "essential" storyline could be established, only utilizing facts common through "truth" presented by all of the various organizations involved.
Finding out who disseminates what information and how integral it is to each organization's view of the universe may, or may not, yield some interesting results.
When I approach a conspiracy, I focus on the people and not the events or "facts". People create conspiracies, not things or information. This is either done intentionally through misrepresentation or unintentionally either by carelessness or by being deceived personally.
After watching a video posted in this thread (http://www.amkon.net/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=109374#p109374), and witnessing the subject of the video make several references to Philip Corso's book as being a primary motivation for research, I found myself asking the following questions.
* How incestuous is the UFOlogy community surrounding the investigation of government documentation of UFOs and aliens?
* What people keep cropping up time and time again as either sources or "inspiration" for research?
* How many times to the agree/disagree and on what points?
An "essential" storyline could be established, only utilizing facts common through "truth" presented by all of the various organizations involved.
Finding out who disseminates what information and how integral it is to each organization's view of the universe may, or may not, yield some interesting results.