Moon & Mars Glass Tubing

[graham72]

Im back. purely because i have nowhere else to go.
So your stuck with me. ... Cog !

First things first, my apologies for the foul language used in previous threads. My applogies to all concerned, and any defamatory remarks to other forum members. You know who you are.

So, I watched the temp link of Moon Rising. I noticed on this particular section the following crater. Does anyone think this resembles the glass tubes on mars.

I may add there has been NO filters applied to this, it is just a plain screenshot from the film.

[Ima Nasshole]

Graham, It takes a real man to sack-up and admit when he's been horribly wrong, good on ya! And though I was not a victim of your tirade, I'm sure I will be at some point in the future, so thank you and welcome back fucker! This is Amkon, sack-up and move on!

Of course if you decide to do it again in the future... just go start your own site, although I must warn you, hoaxmasters is already taken.

[Yex]

They aren`t glass tubes on mars,

they are giant worms, as in Dune

http://image.examiner.com/images/blog/wysiwyg/image/dune_frank_herbert.jpg

[graham72]

This information was compiled by Ronald Regehr; a researcher and scientist in the defence industry and NASA. His main attribute seems to be that he is an out-of-the-box thinker. I extracted and edited some of the more juicy bits of info to tickle your fancy.

1. Moon’s Age:
Is much older than previously expected and maybe even older than the Earth or even the Sun. Earth’s age is estimated to be 4.6 billion years old at the most by some scientists – while various moon rocks were dated at 5.3 billion years old. What’s more puzzling is that the dust upon which they were resting was at least another billion years older.
2. Rock’s Origin:
The chemical composition of the dust below the rocks differs remarkably from the rocks themselves. This excludes the possibility that the dust resulted from the weathering rocks themselves. Where did the rocks come from? Somewhere else?
3. Heavier Elements on Surface:
On Earth and the composition of other planets, the heavier elements are normally found in the core while the lighter materials are concentrated at the surface. But not so with the moon. The abundance of refractory elements like titanium in the surface areas is so pronounced, that several geologists proposed that the refractory compounds must have been brought to the moon’s surface in great quantity in some unknown way. They are adamant. They don’t know how, but there is no other way for this to have happened!
4. Water Vapour:
On the 7th March 1971, lunar instruments that were positioned on the moon by the astronauts recorded a cloud of water vapour passing across the surface of the moon. The cloud covered an area of about 100 square miles and lasted 14 hours.
5. Magnetic Rocks:
Moon rocks are magnetised. This is very strange because there is no magnetic field on the moon itself. And it could not have originated from a "lose call" with Earth because such an encounter would have ripped the moon apart.
6. No Volcanoes:
Some of the moon’s craters originated internally, yet there is no indication that the moon was ever hot enough to produce volcanic eruptions.
7. Moon Mascons:
Mascons are large, dense, circular masses, lying twenty to forty miles beneath the centres of each of the moon’s large maria (dried crater-like ocean beds). Some scientists suggest that these are broad, disk-shaped objects, that could even be some kind of artificial constructions. Huge circular disks would not appear perfectly centred beneath each huge mare by coincidence or accident, they claim.
8. Seismic Activity:
Hundreds of "moonquakes" are recorded each year that cannot be attributed to meteor strikes. In November 1958, Soviet astronomer Nikolay A. Kozyrev of the Crimean Astrophysical Observatory photographed a gaseous eruption of the moon near the crater Alphonsus. He also detected a reddish glow that lasted for about an hour. In 1963, astronomers at the Lowell Observatory also saw reddish glows on the crests of ridges in the Aristarchus region.

What is really fascinating about these events, is that they were observed to be identical in their activity and they occur precisely and periodically, repeating themselves as the moon moves closer to Earth. These are probably not natural phenomena.
9. Hollow Moon:
The moon’s mean density is 3.34 gm/cm3 (3.34 times an equal volume of water) whereas the Earth’s mean density is 5.5. What does this mean? In 1962, NASA scientist Dr. Gordon MacDonald stated, "If the astronomical data are reduced, it is found that the data require that the interior of the moon is more like a hollow than a homogeneous sphere."

Nobel chemist Dr. Harold Urey suggested the moon’s reduced density is because of large areas inside the moon where is "simply a cavity."

MIT’s Dr. Sean C. Solomon wrote, "the Lunar Orbiter experiments vastly improved our knowledge of the moon’s gravitational field… indicating the frightening possibility that the moon might be hollow."

In Carl Sagan’s work Intelligent Life in the Universe, the famous astronomer stated, "A natural satellite cannot be a hollow object."
10. Moon Echoes:
On the 20th November 1969, the crew of Apollo 12 jettisoned the lunar module ascent stage causing it to crash onto the moon some 40 miles from the Apollo 12 landing site. This created an artificial moonquake with startling characteristics. The moon reverberated like a bell for more than an hour. This phenomenon was intentionally repeated with Apollo 13, when they allowed the third stage to impact the moon. The results were even more startling. Seismic instruments recorded that the reverberations lasted for three hours and twenty minutes and travelled to a depth of twenty-five miles. This lead to the conclusion that the moon has an unusually light, or even no core.
11. Unusual Metals:
The moon’s crust is much harder than presumed. The astronauts encountered extreme difficulty when they tried to drill into the maria. The maria is composed primarily ilmenite, which is a mineral containing large amounts of titanium, the same metal used to fabricate the hulls of deep-diving submarines and the skin of the SR-71 "Blackbird". What is even more puzzling, was the discovery of Uranium 236 and Neptunium 237 in lunar rocks (elements not found in nature on Earth). And a further surprise was finding rustproof iron particles. What?
12. Moon’s Origin:
Before the moon rocks conclusively disproved all the common theories about the moon’s origins, these were some of the theories.

The moon was believed to have originated when a chunk of Earth broke off eons ago (who knows from where, if the materials are not the same?).

Another theory was that the moon was created from leftover "space dust" remaining after the Earth was created. Analysis of the composition of moon rocks disproved this theory also.

Another popular theory is that the moon was somehow "captured" by the Earth’s gravitational attraction. But no scientific evidence exists to support this theory. Isaac Asimov stated, "It’s too big to have been captured by the Earth. The chances of such a capture having been effected and the moon then having taken up a nearly circular orbit around our Earth, are too small to make such an eventuality credible."
13. Weird Orbit:
Our moon does not rotate on its axis. We only ever see one side of the moon. There is what is known as the "dark side of the moon" that we have never seen from Earth. It is the only moon in the solar system that has a stationary, near-perfect circular orbit. Stranger still, the moon’s centre of mass is about 6000 feet closer to the Earth than its geometric centre (which should cause wobbling), but the moon’s bulge is on the far side of the moon, away from the Earth. "Something or someone" had to put the moon in orbit with its precise altitude, course, and speed.
14. Moon Diameter:
How does one explain the "coincidence" that the moon is just the right distance, coupled with just the right diameter, to completely cover the sun during an eclipse? Again, Isaac Asimov responds, "There is no astronomical reason why the moon and the sun should fit so well. It is the sheerest of coincidences, and only the Earth among all the planets is blessed in this fashion."
15. Spaceship Moon Theory:
As outrageous as it may sound, it is quite possible that the moon is a giant, intelligently designed spaceship, with a specific purpose. The facts lead us convincingly to such an insane conclusion. The only theory that is supported by all of the data, is that the moon is a gigantic extraterrestrial craft, brought here eons ago by intelligent beings, and there is no data that seems to contradict this theory.

[Cogburn]

WB Graham.

Moon Rising is bullshit.

* Those are not real color images. They are UVVIS composites comprising natural light, UV and IR. There is no "blue" on the moon.
* Escamilla states that NASA only releases parallax views of the Moon, and then proceeds to contradict himself for the remainder of the video by utilizing the USGS complete surface plot.
* Animations attempting to reveal objects "above the surface" have been digitally "lifted" from the picture and placed in a false stereographic perspective. This provides the illusion that the objects are "suspended" above the image when no such proof is evident in the originals. Escamilla never admits to utilizing this technique, however it is clearly evident in the videos.
* Why Escamilla pretends to have "discovered" the USGS complete surface plot when Lear and Zorgon have been pulling shit from it for years someone will need to explain to me.

This is not intended to infer that there aren't mysteries on the Moon. Hell, there are mysteries still here on Earth.

Unfortunately there will always be those snake oil salesmen like Escamilla that will try to profit from pareidolia and ignorance.

[century]

Graham there probably just dunes man

[Cogburn]

Holy shit, cent.

Smite for reality check.

[century]

http://starbase.jpl.nasa.gov/archive/archive/mgs-m-moc-na_wa-2-dsdp-l0-v1.0/mgsc_0007/browse/sp2430/sp243004.htm


anybody want to tackle this picture


Probably to big to put full res.

[century]

Its not natural, thats all I will say.

[Cogburn]

/facepalm

There's not enough evidence to proclaim that.

What are the wind patterns in the area?

What is the composition of that structure?

Was that structure formerly submerged?

Do you have an image with a higher resolution where more detail may be obtained?

Curious... but still a long way from "OMGWTF".

[century]

Just click on the link Cog for full resolution, and quit being in denial

[skunk]

The picture isn't loading for me bah.

[century]

There you go Skunky

[theeindiee]

It's the letter T

T= terra

So... jump to conclusion.... the moon is a baby Earth and when our Earth dies, the ETs will make T into E and get another M and then the whole S will reapeat over again

[century]

I was thinking penis not "T"

[GhostOfCaptSpaulding]

The image on the left is Mr. Krab's anchor shaped house...

http://i233.photobucket.com/albums/ee162/21b45o13x25c54o34d45e/Mr_Krabs_Haus2.jpg

Who knew he lived on the moon?

The one on the right looks like glass tubing of a different sort...

[Cogburn]

Just click on the link Cog for full resolution, and quit being in denial
You dippy-do I mean the "high rez" version. It's shit.... that resolution can't be less than 50m:1... that imager is just fucking pathetic. Not that it matters because of the fact that the surface is so washed out with sunlight that it maxes out on the whitescale of the imager.

You can't get a single bit of detail off of the surface of that fucker to tell if it's made out of rock or chocolate flavored marshmallow.

The only thing of which I am in denial is allowing myself to be intellectually aligned with bullshit. :smokin:

[century]

Thank JPL

[Lexion]

Thank JPL

John Phucking Lear ?

Wondering,
Lex

[century]

LEX ITS AN EQUILATERAL TRIANGLE

[century]

Thank JPL

John Phucking Lear ?

Wondering,
Lex







Jack Parsons Lab

[Cogburn]

LEX ITS AN EQUILATERAL TRIANGLE
How can you tell? Part of it is missing. For all that images shows, that edge could extend for 5 more miles.

[Lexion]

Yeah, my humor is lame.

Pretty cool pic, though.

Lex

[century]

Longitude of image center: 129.48°W
Latitude of image center: 15.93°N


Mr. Malin Claims those are the coordinates
but I cant find a HIRISE picture of the full anomaly

can anyone help? :|

[century]

Ya.... your right its not equilateral, my bad.

[century]

Looks like trees
http://www.msss.com/moc_gallery/m07_m12/mediummaps/M08/M0804688.jpg

[century]

Dark Mission: good book although I don't think Berra has got it all right.


zMVNU8V3_zE

sMcjZagAT4Y

-CdODr0eUcQ

PVyVjnMHdU4

5XrXjYw7zHI

5nRhZY-u4zU

8ixcv8PY05w

JWe3imc77tw

ZVZUA6uojrQ

[century]

I recommend part 7 for Cog

[Cogburn]

I've got the 2009 edition of the book.

I'm unimpressed.

I've seen better masonic conspiracy theory on GLP.