View Full Version : IT's Coming and it won't be LONG.
WarlordZeroOne
07-02-2009, 05:12 PM
Bolton: Israeli Attack the Only Option on Iranian Nukes
Reported: 17:18 PM - Jul/02/09
(IsraelNN.com) United States President Barack Obama’s policies have left an Israeli attack on Iran the only option in preventing the Islamic Republic from obtaining a nuclear weapon, according to an article written by former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton in the Washington Post Thursday. In the article, Bolton said, "Israel's decision of whether to use military force against Tehran's nuclear weapons program is more urgent than ever… Those who oppose Iran acquiring nuclear weapons are left in the near term with only the option of targeted military force against its weapons facilities.”
Bolton claimed that the Iranian nuclear threat is even more certain following the apparent failure of the resistance movement in Iran. “Anyone who believes the Revolutionary Guard Corps will abandon its weaponization and ballistic missile programs probably believes that there was no fraud in Iran's June 12 election.”
Not expecting the Tehran government to bargain in good faith, Bolton wrote that negotiations with Iran would place Israel in “an even more dangerous trap." Failure to stage a pre-emptive attack on Iran means that the world must “be prepared for an Iran with nuclear weapons
:bom: :bom: :bom: IRAN.
Snow Crash
07-02-2009, 05:35 PM
IT's Coming and it won't be LONG.
Are you talking about your dick again?
Seek help man, seriously.
WarlordZeroOne
07-02-2009, 05:43 PM
Snow thanx the help that came from you, seriously fucks peoples heads,now i can see why you got fired, and i like the way you go on about my Dick,have you not got one,seriously.LOL :lol:
cartoon
07-02-2009, 05:43 PM
bolton.. Bolton? BOLTON??
Snow Crash
07-02-2009, 05:49 PM
Snow thanx the help that came from you, seriously fucks peoples heads,now i can see why you got fired, and i like the way you go on about my Dick,have you not got one,seriously.LOL :lol:
A witty retort, to be sure. I am blown away. Seriously.
Cogburn
07-02-2009, 05:51 PM
Bolton: Israeli Attack the Only Option on Iranian Nukes
Reported: 17:18 PM - Jul/02/09
(IsraelNN.com) United States President Barack Obama’s policies have left an Israeli attack on Iran the only option in preventing the Islamic Republic from obtaining a nuclear weapon, according to an article written by former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton in the Washington Post Thursday. In the article, Bolton said, "Israel's decision of whether to use military force against Tehran's nuclear weapons program is more urgent than ever… Those who oppose Iran acquiring nuclear weapons are left in the near term with only the option of targeted military force against its weapons facilities.”
Bolton claimed that the Iranian nuclear threat is even more certain following the apparent failure of the resistance movement in Iran. “Anyone who believes the Revolutionary Guard Corps will abandon its weaponization and ballistic missile programs probably believes that there was no fraud in Iran's June 12 election.”
Not expecting the Tehran government to bargain in good faith, Bolton wrote that negotiations with Iran would place Israel in “an even more dangerous trap." Failure to stage a pre-emptive attack on Iran means that the world must “be prepared for an Iran with nuclear weapons
:bom: :bom: :bom: IRAN.
http://www.webdesign-guru.co.uk/icon/wp-content/uploads/approved.gif
cartoon
07-02-2009, 05:53 PM
A witty retortyeah. he's getting better. now if only he could shit-can the damned emoticons.
WarlordZeroOne
07-02-2009, 05:57 PM
O.K. thats a Truce from me, and a friendly one as well.
cartoon
07-02-2009, 05:58 PM
no truce. we take no prisoners.
Snow Crash
07-02-2009, 06:03 PM
O.K. thats a Truce from me, and a friendly one as well.
So who were you, btw?
Snow Crash
07-02-2009, 06:07 PM
no truce. we take no prisoners.
We don't take POWs.
We do, however, practice extraordinary rendition on unlawful combatants.
We call it Air Amkon. We also run dr............. oh wait thats classified.
Undate on the article . . . .
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columns/OpEd-Contributor/Downgrading-Israel-won_t-stop-Iran_s-nuclear-ambitions-7909438-49604047.html
Herbert London on downgrading Israel won't stop Iran's nuclear ambitions
By: Herbert London
OpEd Contributor | 7/1/09 8:55 PM
Based on hints, feints, public pronouncements, and off-the-record commentary, the Obama administration's stance toward Iran is in focus: The U.S. will do nothing to prevent the further enrichment of uranium by Iran's mullahs.
The negotiations with Iran are based on the premise that Iran can produce as much enriched uranium as it wants as long as a nuclear bomb isn't manufactured. In other words, the conditions for a bomb without actually making one.
This is a distinction without a difference -- the bomb can be made in days if deployment is in the cards. If Obama can get the Iranians to agree to this arrangement with adequate blandishments provided by our side, such as the lifting of sanctions, he will announce that "peace" between Iran and the West has been achieved.
It will be seen as a significant diplomatic breakthrough. For keen observers, however, it will be regarded as a Munich peace.
In order to play down the threat to Israel's survival, Obama will argue that the United States stands committed to employ its nuclear umbrella to protect Israel against nuclear attack. Although this offer will be made with apparent sincerity, it is hard to believe that Obama would be willing to risk the safety of New York in order to protect Tel Aviv. Moreover, it is also hard to believe any serious official in Israel will accept this proposal, albeit other options may not be available.
The Obama administration has made it clear that it will punish Israel if it attacks Iran unilaterally. Having failed to contain Iran, the United States is concentrating on restraining Israel. Administration contingency plans include a formal condemnation of Israel, support for a United Nations Security Council resolution that could include sanctions against it, and suspending military aid to the Jewish state.
The big question is what the Obama administration will do if Israel, determining that Iran with the capacity to build nuclear weapons is an existential threat, attacks Iran. Moreover, Iran would retaliate against Israel in addition to possibly shutting down the 29-mile wide Strait of Hormuz, through which 20 percent of the world's crude oil is transported.
How will President Obama react? Would the U.S. fight back, or would it blame Israel for the preemptive attack on Iran, appealing to the "Muslim world" for understanding?
Decades of appeasement and accommodations have led to the present impasse. These policy blunders cannot be solely attributed to Obama. In fact, blame belongs on both sides of the political aisle.
What distinguishes Obama's diplomatic initiative from others is the "downgrading" of Israel in order to strike a grand bargain with Iran for regional pacification. Whether Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu wants it or not, Jerusalem is now on a collision course with Washington.
Netanyahu is attempting to establish a nexus between a Palestinian accord and the elimination of this threat. After all, he contends, Iran potential nuclear weapons would serve as a cover for Hamas missile attacks against Israel, since escalation could lead to a nuclear exchange and should be avoided at all cost.
The Obama administration's position is the opposite. It appears to be arguing that an accommodative Israel that makes a deal with the Palestinians for a separate state will have American protection against a possible Iranian nuclear attack. But the first and overarching responsibility lies with Israel to arrange its negotiated settlement with Palestinian leaders.
Obama believes time is on his side since he has already conceded that Iran will have the time to enrich enough uranium to build a nuclear weapon. Netanyahu, unable to accept the potential threat, feels time is of the essence. The closer Iran gets to the fateful tipping point, the closer Israel is to danger.
Erstwhile President Jimmy Carter tried to assuage Israeli leaders in 1979 by noting that his craven concession to Iranian leaders did not pose a threat to Israel. Is Obama preparing to go one step further? History is waiting impatiently for an answer.
Herbert London is president of Hudson Institute and professor emeritus of New York University. He is the author of Decade of Denial (Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books, 2001) and America's Secular Challenge (Encounter Books).
Here the link to wz article . . . http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/Flash.aspx/167384
ApolloRising
07-02-2009, 07:49 PM
U.S. President Barack Obama’s policies have left an Israeli attack on Iran the only option in preventing the Muslim country from obtaining a nuclear weapon, - israelnationalnews.com
Love how Israelnationalnews.com emphasises the state religion of Iran, particularly how it does so in context to suggest that specifically the fact that its religion is Islam makes it more of a threat, more of an undesirable. Which, that's state sponsered racism, far as I can see..
Preventing the Muslim country? What about the Jewish country; if one out-dated hateful religion is allowed nukes why not the other?
But really, the point is that the emphasis on cultural/religious devision is concerning, I mean, by no means a new thing, but to put it so blatently in national news...
Snow Crash
07-02-2009, 09:24 PM
Preventing the Muslim country? What about the Jewish country; if one out-dated hateful religion is allowed nukes why not the other?
Smitage for truthage