View Full Version : Nine new (To me) Moon Pics with anomalies
Not noticed these pics before, just posted at UFO Casebook, What do you reckon, Photoshopped?
http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/4255/hrp76.jpg
http://ufocasebook.conforums.com/index.cgi?board=moon&action=display&num=1246191570
pack3tg0st
06-28-2009, 02:40 PM
Looks like rocks and craters to me...
Lexion
06-28-2009, 03:04 PM
Looks like rocks and craters to me...
Buzzkill.
Smite for truth.
Regards,
Lex
GeneralStriker
06-28-2009, 03:05 PM
Yex- the guy just happened to 'come across some new pictures?' Where's the provenance? But hey- that pic you posted does look a lot like the Taos City Hall. How the hell did that get to the moon? jesus... shocking!
pack3tg0st
06-28-2009, 03:17 PM
WTF is up with this?
Jupiter's moon Castillo...
Does this mean Masons have traveled to Jupiter's Moons?
[attachment=0:3vcpdsdt]PIA03456.jpg[/attachment:3vcpdsdt]
See how I did that?
GeneralStriker
06-28-2009, 03:20 PM
See how I did that?Hell no. How you do that?? You da man!
pack3tg0st
06-28-2009, 03:23 PM
Package it up and send it to john?
Perhaps we can convince GLP or ATS that the masons are really ruled by an alien who resides on the moon castillo?
Lexion
06-28-2009, 03:23 PM
WTF is up with this?
Jupiter's moon Castillo...
Does this mean Masons have traveled to Jupiter's Moons?
[attachment=0:jh2y69qa]PIA03456.jpg[/attachment:jh2y69qa]
See how I did that?
Spin.
It's what's for dinner.
Twirling,
Lex
GeneralStriker
06-28-2009, 03:34 PM
Package it up and send it to john?
Perhaps we can convince GLP or ATS that the masons are really ruled by an alien who resides on the moon castillo?
Well yes and no. The Gloopoids already know that the world is run by reptilian overlords. but John always loves a good sketch.
Cogburn
06-28-2009, 04:47 PM
There's nothing there.
[attachment=0:3btc34et]ummmmlolwut.jpg[/attachment:3btc34et]
That place is just weird.
Ima Nasshole
06-28-2009, 05:02 PM
I did see an A on the photo, a little lower and to the left of that arrow... Do you suppose it was put there by a bunch of kids at Apollo High?
GeneralStriker
06-28-2009, 06:03 PM
There's nothing there...only if you discount the giant alien arrow.
Lexion
06-28-2009, 06:04 PM
TWEEEEE !!!!!!
Cogburn
06-28-2009, 06:06 PM
There's nothing there...only if you discount the giant alien arrow.
OMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMG
Ima Nasshole
06-28-2009, 06:19 PM
Actually, after running it through a couple of filters I see something now. There may be something to these new photos. You'll need to zoom in to where the arrow is, it's actually there. Holy shit!
[attachment=0:2indof47]hrp76 copy.jpg[/attachment:2indof47]
Lexion
06-28-2009, 06:22 PM
Ima found a rock !!
TWEEEEEEEEEEEEE !!!!!!!
Cogburn
06-28-2009, 06:25 PM
LOL Ima post that as a reply on UFO casebook.
Ima Nasshole
06-28-2009, 06:27 PM
LOL Ima post that as a reply on UFO casebook.
Come again?
Got it! ufocasebook.com Ummmmmm, hmmmmmmm, okay!
Cogburn
06-28-2009, 06:29 PM
http://ufocasebook.conforums.com/index.cgi?board=moon&action=display&num=1246191570
Ima Nasshole
06-28-2009, 06:32 PM
Looks like I have to join first. Saw Yex on there... Yex, copy this photo and post it on http://ufocasebook.conforums.com/index.cgi?board=moon&action=display&num=1246191570 for me please. Thanks
http://i533.photobucket.com/albums/ee334/TheRooster99/hrp76copy.jpg
Looks like I have to join first. Saw Yex on there... Yex, copy this photo and post it on http://ufocasebook.conforums.com/index.cgi?board=moon&action=display&num=1246191570 for me please. Thanks
http://i533.photobucket.com/albums/ee334/TheRooster99/hrp76copy.jpg
Done. You fuckers are a bad influence, I`ll probably get banned on my second post!
:D
theeindiee
06-28-2009, 08:19 PM
Can we add twee to the urban dictionary?
Cogburn
06-28-2009, 08:21 PM
Looks like I have to join first. Saw Yex on there... Yex, copy this photo and post it on http://ufocasebook.conforums.com/index.cgi?board=moon&action=display&num=1246191570 for me please. Thanks
http://i533.photobucket.com/albums/ee334/TheRooster99/hrp76copy.jpg
Done. You fuckers are a bad influence, I`ll probably get banned on my second post!
:D
Epic.
:lol:
Ima Nasshole
06-28-2009, 08:29 PM
Can we add twee to the urban dictionary?
It's been there forever, was the word of the day back in 2007
apeci
06-28-2009, 09:11 PM
WTF is up with this?
Jupiter's moon Castillo...
http://www.amkon.net/phpBB3/download/file.php?id=2088
I had look at the pic on the site what is sticking out of this one!
[attachment=0:2mkelgr2]hrp177.jpg[/attachment:2mkelgr2]
boycotteverything
06-28-2009, 10:09 PM
soul catcher?
boycotteverything
06-28-2009, 10:19 PM
WTF is up with this?
Jupiter's moon Castillo...
http://www.amkon.net/phpBB3/download/file.php?id=2088
http://www.amkon.net/phpBB3/download/file.php?id=2096
I think we just demonstrated how the zodiac was concocted. This might be the end of astrology!
Yex, its a model would be my guess, ala Naysmith or similar......... :shock:
Yex, its a model would be my guess, ala Naysmith or similar......... :shock:
nope, just done a bit of googling with the pic number and found the nasa original
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/SP-362/hrp76.jpg
from here http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/SP-362/hrp76.jpg
not really into the moon anomaly stuff, squinting at pixellated zoom-ins gives me a headache, but I must admit this one aint no model
Cogburn
06-29-2009, 03:12 AM
The contrast is so washed out who knows what the fuck we're looking at.
Yex, its a model would be my guess, ala Naysmith or similar......... :shock:
nope, just done a bit of googling with the pic number and found the nasa original
from here http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/SP-362/hrp76.jpg
not really into the moon anomaly stuff, squinting at pixellated zoom-ins gives me a headache, but I must admit this one aint no model
then get a big fuck-off magnifying glass like I got :roll:
as far as NASA having the image stored with what-ever label' , I would never take their word as to the origins of some of their stock verbatim, they tell fibs you know :thegeneral:
there is so much obvious looking structure and what-not in that pic, I am suspicious from the get-go, again with the :thegeneral: the whole perspective, just does not look right.........nothing I would love more than to be wrong.Did you see the colour Apollo 17 lander images I had posted on JL's Moon thread Yex ?
this is said to be a shot of the lunar surface Yex,Apollo 17..........NASA said so
It is obviously a filter overlay,check the edge out, bad cropping :cry:
[attachment=0:2ffmxmqz]Bad cropping Apollo 17.jpg[/attachment:2ffmxmqz]
Boriska115
06-29-2009, 07:53 PM
I'd like to know why there would be two arrows and the letter A marking spots on a pic of the moon directly from NASA themselves.
I also noticed what could possibly be smoke coming out of the surface. The only image editing software I have is MSPaint, so I can't zoom in too much, but it looks like there's two smoke trails with shadows underneath and everything to me. Could they be smoke? clouds? or am I just seeing things? :|
pack3tg0st
06-29-2009, 07:58 PM
Check out Gimp man...
Its about as powerful as photoshop...
and free!
http://www.gimp.org/
It was originally for linux... but they've made a windows version now.
Ima Nasshole
06-29-2009, 08:18 PM
I had look at the pic on the site what is sticking out of this one!
[attachment=1:1rudmkw9]hrp177.jpg[/attachment:1rudmkw9]
That Lala is a standard issue Radio Shack metal detector pressed against the surface of a model moon at NAZA's Goddard Observatory's souvenier shop during a "media day" outing for various press dignitaries.
http://www.spaceref.com/calendar/calendar.html?pid=5431
[attachment=0:1rudmkw9]radioshack.jpg[/attachment:1rudmkw9]
Cogburn
06-29-2009, 08:32 PM
I'd like to know why there would be two arrows and the letter A marking spots on a pic of the moon directly from NASA themselves.
I also noticed what could possibly be smoke coming out of the surface. The only image editing software I have is MSPaint, so I can't zoom in too much, but it looks like there's two smoke trails with shadows underneath and everything to me. Could they be smoke? clouds? or am I just seeing things? :|
I almost had a "wow" moment there, until you take a closer look at the features and compare them to surrounding features.
Compare the color coded arrows below. Matching colors indicate matching features based on luminosity of the object and the surrounding terrain.
It's curious at first, until you see that the surrounding features match.
If that's smoke, it's all smoke, and given the nature of the other features present I don't think that's likely at all.
[attachment=0:1318ujsl]hrp76_smoke.jpg[/attachment:1318ujsl]
Welcome to AmKon! Smite cherry, taken!
silly boulder(s),..........thats not how to roll :roll:
[attachment=0:3bppxmcr]boulder my arse.gif[/attachment:3bppxmcr]
Cogburn
06-30-2009, 01:54 AM
LOL WTF...
(opens Photoshop)
EDIT: Wait... a GIF? Which frame is that? I want a TIFF or JPEG...
EDIT EDIT: Lunar Orbiter 5, frame 168-H2
Cogburn
06-30-2009, 02:25 AM
There's actually two boulders.
http://i42.tinypic.com/15fktau.jpg
I dunno man... looks like a rock to me.
http://i40.tinypic.com/okdesx.jpg
if you look close cog you can see the silly rock rolled back up the crater edge, the other track-lines on the rhs of the pic (which also has a L-R "apparent" movement, are misaligned due to to sloppy workmanship , I must have posted dozens of LO pics ,downloaded at largest size and scanned with my trusty mag glass :shock: still my favourite thing to do when peace and quiet allow, this one is best presented by Kieth Laney, he aslso pointed out the unlikelyness of a boulder leaving such a "tread" pattern, unless said boulder was damn near spherical its difficult to see how the pattern would repeat so,
At best, (assuming it is a genuine shot of the Lunar surface).....I think that photo is one of the better "possible" anomaly pics about. I have a similar pic attributed to Mars....but below are a few of Nasmyth's Lunar surface model's
[attachment=2:2ibj4fsr]Science_&_Society_10196589.jpg[/attachment:2ibj4fsr]
[attachment=1:2ibj4fsr]Science_&_Society_10321813.jpg[/attachment:2ibj4fsr]
[attachment=0:2ibj4fsr]Science_&_Society_10415926.jpg[/attachment:2ibj4fsr]
considering these were done 19th century,.......it isnt that far from the realms of possibillity that with later advanced photographic techniques, maybe a slight fish-eye effect to lend curvature, that some of these could past muster as the real thing ?
here is the other track pic, cant remember where it came from and dont have any text, Im sure it was attributed to Mars?......could just as easily be a dessert area anywhere I guess
[attachment=0:2gm0ra1k]Tracks_001.png[/attachment:2gm0ra1k]
the r-h bottom corner in pic above has a "squarish" look also?
how about the dome in the crater below?
[attachment=0:3of8ibnp]dome.JPG[/attachment:3of8ibnp]
Cogburn
06-30-2009, 02:03 PM
if you look close cog you can see the silly rock rolled back up the crater edge, the other track-lines on the rhs of the pic (which also has a L-R "apparent" movement, are misaligned due to to sloppy workmanship , I must have posted dozens of LO pics ,downloaded at largest size and scanned with my trusty mag glass :shock: still my favourite thing to do when peace and quiet allow, this one is best presented by Kieth Laney, he aslso pointed out the unlikelyness of a boulder leaving such a "tread" pattern, unless said boulder was damn near spherical its difficult to see how the pattern would repeat so,
Two assumptions not in evidence.
First, the assumption that the rock rolled "uphill". Unless I'm missing something, gravity still works on the Moon.
Second, the assumption that the pattern requires a spherical object. For the larger rock, quite the opposite.
http://i40.tinypic.com/okdesx.jpg
You can see in the image above that the rock is clearly irregular in shape and at best roughly spherical. If you took a large rock and hewed it to a similar shape and rolled it through sand, would you not see a similar uneven pattern?
considering these were done 19th century,.......it isnt that far from the realms of possibillity that with later advanced photographic techniques, maybe a slight fish-eye effect to lend curvature, that some of these could past muster as the real thing ?
Perhaps, but there's nothing to indicate a much of a motivation for doing so.
If you examine the argument, the justification for "faking" cosmological photos is to hide evidence of facts known prior to the vehicle being launched into space.
The atom bomb was kept secret not 15 years earlier, why not keep the entire space program a secret and pretend it never happened instead of incurring the potential for conspiracy?
Let's face it... if you're creating a conspiracy you have to at least admit to yourself the possibility of being discovered and you'll opt for those decisions that allow for the lowest discoverable surface area while still achieving your goals.
If the above is true, the reasons one might fake space photographs are suddenly a bit more terrestrial.
But then were I to be honest I would have to admit that I'm simply insane in a completely different way. I think that UFOs are simply human beings stumbling upon the same technology over and over and over again and only in the past 100 years have we figured out how not to kill ourselves using it.
Cog wrote
Two assumptions not in evidence.
First, the assumption that the rock rolled "uphill". Unless I'm missing something, gravity still works on the Moon.
Second, the assumption that the pattern requires a spherical object. For the larger rock, quite the opposite.
1st assumption?,.........as the "rock" rolls, at the point where it passes the small dark crater, it seems to me there is a downward incline, gentle slope , toward the middle of the crater on the left, the "rock" then swings out toward the right, as we view it, also , further up the track, it rolls through a dark area, with the sun casting shadow from right to left, would you not consider the dark region a slope falling again to the left?, this does not seem to effect the movement , down-screen of the object?
You can see in the image above that the rock is clearly irregular in shape and at best roughly spherical. If you took a large rock and hewed it to a similar shape and rolled it through sand, would you not see a similar uneven pattern?
sure I would, if the slope the "rock" was rolling down, was peerfectly uniform on all levels, the surface in the photo I dont think can be claimed as such
Cogburn
07-03-2009, 04:11 AM
I'd agree with you were it not for one thing....
We have no idea the amount of force propelling those rocks. With enough force, would not those tracks be possible? Even uphill?
There's nothing to indicate that those rocks weren't broken free from their original positions by the impact of a meteorite.
century
07-03-2009, 05:00 PM
here is the other track pic, cant remember where it came from and dont have any text, Im sure it was attributed to Mars?......could just as easily be a dessert area anywhere I guess
[attachment=0:36wxt9fo]Tracks_001.png[/attachment:36wxt9fo]
http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/PSP_001415_1875
century
07-03-2009, 05:04 PM
(PSP_001415_1875)
Cogburn
07-03-2009, 05:11 PM
Devil's Racetrack, California.
http://i.pbase.com/u44/zeroscan/upload/28652293.CRW_4695copy.jpg
[offsite=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racetrack_Playa:3czt5vxf]The sailing stones are a geological phenomenon found in the Racetrack. The stones slowly move across the surface of the playa, leaving a track as they go, without human or animal intervention. They have never been seen or filmed in motion. Racetrack stones only move once every two or three years and most tracks last for just three or four years. Stones with rough bottoms leave straight striated tracks while those with smooth bottoms wander. Stones sometimes turn over, exposing another edge to the ground and leaving a different-sized track in the stone's wake.[citation needed]
The sailing stones are most likely moved by strong winter winds (up to 90 mph), once it has rained enough to fill the playa with just enough water to make the clay slippery. The prevailing winds across Racetrack Playa travel blow from southwest to northeast. Most of the rock trails are parallel to this direction, lending support to this hypothesis.[citation needed]
An alternate hypothesis builds upon the first. As rain water accumulates, strong winds blow thin sheets of water quickly over the relatively flat surface of the playa. A layer of ice forms on the surface as night temperatures fall below freezing. Wind then drives these floating ice sheets, their aggregate inertia providing the necessary force required to move the larger stones. Rock trails are again expected to remain parallel to the SW winds.[/offsite:3czt5vxf]
As above, so below. No?
century
07-03-2009, 05:15 PM
Well are you saying they can move without rain?
century
07-03-2009, 05:16 PM
Or is it the increased wind speed?
Cogburn
07-03-2009, 06:22 PM
I'm saying that there's similar phenomena that exist on this planet that remain unexplained. No one has ever filmed the rocks in motion. Ever.
I've been there because I wanted to see it for myself. There is nothing within the entire breadth and depth of my knowledge or experience that can explain what is evidenced on that stretch of desert. Nothing. It is a 100% legitimate mystery of our universe as far as I am concerned, and it's not on some distant planet... you can go and witness it for yourself.
Would it not be even more fantastic if the solution to both riddles was the same?
here is the other track pic, cant remember where it came from and dont have any text, Im sure it was attributed to Mars?......could just as easily be a dessert area anywhere I guess
[attachment=0]]
that clears that up, cheers Century2156
http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/PSP_001415_1875
I'd agree with you were it not for one thing....
We have no idea the amount of force propelling those rocks. With enough force, would not those tracks be possible? Even uphill?
There's nothing to indicate that those rocks weren't broken free from their original positions by the impact of a meteorite.
call that one a draw?..........moving right along, the dome looking affair at the bottom of that crater? :smokin:
Cogburn
07-04-2009, 03:48 AM
NASA says it's some particular formation unique to the Moon.
Yeah... I don't like explanations like that. The universe doesn't work that way.
Honestly I think it's one of those things to remain a mystery until we're able to really crawl around and give it a good once over.
NASA says it's some particular formation unique to the Moon.
Yeah... I don't like explanations like that. The universe doesn't work that way.
Honestly I think it's one of those things to remain a mystery until we're able to really crawl around and give it a good once over.
I have trouble with this sort of thing to Cog,....Davie crater chain, I think we are being asked to believe these were caused by a rapid fire series of impacts, such precision, would you expect the perfect symmetry we see here?, the clean crisp edges?.......even if you allowed yourself to believe they hit from a perfectly vertical trajectory, harder to swallow than a pickled egg :scratch:
[attachment=1:21j9oxdr]nosedive 6.JPG[/attachment:21j9oxdr]
[attachment=0:21j9oxdr]nosedive 01.JPG[/attachment:21j9oxdr]
Cogburn
07-04-2009, 05:28 AM
The Moon is the only body in the solar system we have explored with any regularity other than our own, and the Earth itself reveals new mysteries almost daily. Why should the other heavenly bodies display any different behavior?
I'm not sure I follow where you're headed. Are we simply browsing the interesting geologic features on the moon?
The Moon is the only body in the solar system we have explored with any regularity other than our own, and the Earth itself reveals new mysteries almost daily. Why should the other heavenly bodies display any different behavior?
I'm not sure I follow where you're headed. Are we simply browsing the interesting geologic features on the moon?
more or less mate, posted all this months back, the only comments were from G72,......soon came to the realisation that unless Mr Lear was on deck no one really gives a fuck about it, thats ok.....I dont think your comparisom to the earths features is valid though, if an explanation regarding a feature on earth was offered up that did not seem to fit what was observed, the area in question could be evaluated first hand, not so regards the Moon, so I thought I would throw a few up as you seemed at least willing to have an opinion, ......never mind
Cogburn
07-04-2009, 06:13 AM
Hehehe... I can't render an opinion on something with so little information.
With so little information there's but one question to ask, really..
Is it possible that the pattern is due to the movement of the Moon about the Earth and the debris was travelling in a straight line?
There's nothing in that image to indicate a timeframe for the impacts, only the position of the projectiles as they traveled through space.
Hehehe... I can't render an opinion on something with so little information.
With so little information there's but one question to ask, really..
Is it possible that the pattern is due to the movement of the Moon about the Earth and the debris was travelling in a straight line?
There's nothing in that image to indicate a timeframe for the impacts, only the position of the projectiles as they traveled through space.
fair enough statement, be interesting to have all these old pics re-evaluated, with 50 odd years of scientific advancement Im sure their could be rational explanations for a lot of these, in saying that I have never actually posed any queries to NASA itself regards the images, which then makes me wonder if anyone has?
here is a Juluy 4th post from y-tube
http://lroc.sese.asu.edu: June 29 15:28:04 UTC 2009 the LRO spacecraft turned on the LROC Narrow Angle camera and recorded a dramatic lunar sunrise passing underneath. Early morning shadows make it easy to detect features as small as 3 meters across.
6]pCPAqbFa7Es6]
Cogburn
07-05-2009, 05:03 AM
The resolution of that video gives me wood.
I can't wait to see the scramble of all the moontards trying to save reputations and careers.
The resolution of that video gives me wood.
I can't wait to see the scramble of all the moontards trying to save reputations and careers.
what height I wonder?, given there are objects resolved as small as 3m?
looks like old LO5 images minus the artistic overlays :roll: