PDA

View Full Version : Weakland says he didn't know priests' abuse was crime



GhostOfCaptSpaulding
05-27-2009, 03:51 PM
[offsite:1h6n45c9]In the early years of the sex abuse scandal in Milwaukee, retired Archbishop Rembert G. Weakland says in his soon-to-be released memoir, he did not comprehend the potential harm to victims or understand that what the priests had done constituted a crime.

"We all considered sexual abuse of minors as a moral evil, but had no understanding of its criminal nature," Weakland says in the book, "A Pilgrim in a Pilgrim Church," due out in June.

Weakland said he initially "accepted naively the common view that it was not necessary to worry about the effects on the youngsters: either they would not remember or they would 'grow out of it.'?"

Clergy victims reacted angrily to the revelation.

"It's beyond belief. He's either lying or he's so self-deceived that he's inventing fanciful stories," said Peter Isely, Midwest director for the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, or SNAP. "These have always been crimes."

Weakland's handling of the clergy sex abuse scandal is just one chapter in the wide-ranging memoir that recounts his childhood in the coal-mining region of Pennsylvania, his life as a Benedictine monk, his struggles with his own homosexuality, his strained relationship with Pope John Paul II and finally his public fall from grace in Milwaukee.

Weakland retired in 2002 after it became known that he paid $450,000 in 1998 to a man who had accused him of date rape years earlier.

Weakland has declined to be interviewed by the Journal Sentinel. Weakland said in the book that he eventually came to question the notion that victims would forget or "grow out of" the trauma induced by abuse.

"My general reasoning was that there were probably some kids who 'grew out of it,' and then some who were deeply disturbed for life," he wrote.

SNAP this week issued an open letter asking Weakland to meet with victims.

Weakland responded Friday by saying he would seriously consider it.

"We've been trying to get this from him for 15 years," Isely said.

Source - JSOnline | Weakland says he didn't know priests' abuse was crime (http://www.jsonline.com/features/religion/45191277.html)[/offsite:1h6n45c9]

Weakland, that's weak man.

Fuckhead's just trying to sell his book.

Why is shit like this allowed to walk around free?

Alessandra
05-27-2009, 04:09 PM
wow.... I... No words can form in my brain as to how fucking pathetic that excuse was/is.

pack3tg0st
05-27-2009, 04:20 PM
Dude, where do you surf for your news?! You're digging up awesome stuff here goos!

I'm jealous!

anyway, on topic:

The church should re-introduce stoning as a punishment...

Nothing says justice than every fuckhead that he messed with chucking a rock at his head...

Alessandra
05-27-2009, 04:24 PM
you know, I'd put a clip in here, but I cant remember if it was Family guy or American Dad....

GhostOfCaptSpaulding
05-27-2009, 04:24 PM
The first quarry of stones should be dumped on the RCC!

No shit!

"If I meet with the victims, will it help me sell more books?"

What an asshole!

Cogburn
05-27-2009, 05:31 PM
Weakland said he initially "accepted naively the common view that it was not necessary to worry about the effects on the youngsters: either they would not remember or they would 'grow out of it.'?"

I just puked in my mouth.

lala
05-27-2009, 06:37 PM
The dirty old thing a . . . .I didn't know it was abuse . . . wtf . . . maybe if we shove a broom up his date he might get the picture . . .but no . . . that the thing with these types of sicko's. . . they always seem to some how justify it in there own minds and beleive there own bullshit . . .they didn't seem to mind . . . the fact that they perverted a innocent mind, the fact that they groom them from a yound age into beleiving it normal to behave that way!!! I have an uncle in england that a perv, in my mind his wife's just as much to blame, as she put the kids to bed with him, it came out years later. When the wife found someone to move on to she used it for the seperation. So there was 4 poor little kids, just totally fucked up. He got done, never went away as he is a nutter anyway . . . I meet him years after the fact. . . .and in the end I went off at him . . . I found what happened unbeleivable, he'd go round talking about it as if he'd won, because he'd got off. . . and in his nutty mind, he didn't think, that he'd done anything wrong as the kids wanted him. . . when it was going down, and if she[wife] hadn't done what she done it would all be ok . . . he think everyone turned the kids against him . . . When I went to england and meet him , the kids and the rest of the family I was shocked that they just pretend he was ok. . . . the councilers had told them it was better that he talked about it. . . so they just let him run with it . . . not me . . . was last family get together he was there and started talking about it as if ok and I just cracked and nutted at all of them. . . .I told them it would be ok to support someone if they knew what they had done was wrong but he doesn't think that and if he that sick he needs to be locked up in a nut house . . and I said to him the only thing that will fix him is a bullet between the eyes as his thinking so fucked there no return . . . most of the family don't want to know . . . but luckly one see him to make sure he doesn't do it to anyone else and thats the only reason, in there minds they do. . .He was the youngest of ten kids by that stage the older children brought him up, and a lot of them carry guilt thinking that maybe it there fault . . . but he just sick in the head. :?

theeindiee
05-27-2009, 10:49 PM
Well... this is an interesting subject... because this seems to be just the way it is in the Priesthood. Is it possible that they are conditioned in a certain way as to find fondling and fucking children okay? Or possibly the Priesthood itself... just attrracts child molestors? You really have to have compassion here.... because you're not inside the guy's head. You don't know where it comes from. To assume someone is evil.... it's like.... assuming that Sirhan Sirhan was just a hateful murdering RFK hater. It is possible that these people have been CONDITIONED to be this way.

Or possibly the embarrassment of having been knowingly complicit is just a very very hard thing to overcome, so he's making excuses to everyone including himself.

Or he could just be an evil guy....

but before we start a lynch mob, let's have compassion and empathy, and then deal with the person through those eyes.

I always say that when dealing with child molesters, not because I don't personally feel the need to rage against some of these people... but because child molesters were once children. Something happened to THEM most likely when they were children, and now it's an impulse engrained in the subconscious mind... which perhaps they could learn to overcome if they were given proper compassion with treatment. But we've judged before we ever get a chance to know.

It sounds like it could be a symptom of post traumatic stress. We won't know until we approach it with kindness instead of hatred.