Earthquake 'Lights' in the Sky?

[Ducky]

I thought this to be pretty interesting.

Upon 1st glance, there appears to be multitudes of what I call 'haphazzardly-shaped rainbows' in the sky.

According to the observer (person who recorded using cellphone), these lights occured BEFORE the China earthquake of May 12, 2008. I'm curious as to whether this is an issolated (localised) incidence or perhaps there are instances, that we have yet to compare with, until more viewers come forward from all around the world, with this kind of photographic evidence.

Very interesting nonetheless!

8]8mfb0ccN4g88]

And another example:

8]1IHoZoAVLo08]

[Die Fledermaus]

Die Fledermaus believes angels are not playing that HAARP.

[Ducky]

Die Fledermaus believes angels are not playing that HAARP.

The lights remind me of the 'Northern Lights'. I've only seen them a few times in my life.

[Foxtrot Oscar]

I'm not an Xpert at all, but isn't a rainbow just the refraction of light through rain. and I know this is true... You can only see one if the sun is behind you (or is it behind the rain) any way the point I was trying to make is that it's just a rainbow kinda thing.

Fox

Where's the weatherman gone?

[Yo Mama]

I JUST saw an article about this in the past week, not having to do with China at all, but explaining the phenomenon.

If my brain would spit out the term for it, I could go get a more extensive explanation.

Basically, this is just like a regular rainbow, except that the water drops in the cloud are all aligned in a particular way that fractionates the light and presents a rainbow in the sky in that manner instead of the usual ones.

I don't think it has anything to do with the earthquake at all. It's coincidental weather patterns.

I have to take my daughter to a doctor's appointment in a half hour. Maybe the name will come to me while I'm out and I'll google it when I get home.

[Yo Mama]

Ta daaaaa:

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news ... -fire.html (http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/06/060619-rainbow-fire.html)

Circumhorizontal arc.

[Bitchkoma]

Die Fledermaus believes angels are not playing that HAARP.

The lights remind me of the 'Northern Lights'. I've only seen them a few times in my life.

I think the General is dismissing the connection too soon. The Flutter-Mouse makes a good point.

Scientists debate new evidence for electromagnetic earthquake predictors (http://news-service.stanford.edu/pr/91/911231Arc1006.html)STANFORD -- As a deepening voice signals a boy's adolescence, audible rumblings, shakings and ventings may warn us of geological change in the earth, according to scientists and engineers.

Enticed with tantalizing but inconclusive evidence, researchers have searched since 1982 for a signal to predict earthquakes. They have monitored extra-low frequency (ELF) and very-low frequency (VLF) radio waves from satellites and from the ground.

New findings suggest researchers may find what they seek at even lower frequencies, said Antony Fraser-Smith, an electrical engineer at Stanford University's Space, Telecommunications and Radioscience (STAR) Laboratory.

In 1989, in the days before the Loma Prieta earthquake, Fraser-Smith detected huge radio signals in the ultra-low frequency (ULF) range, 0.01 to 10 hertz, with an instrument placed 7 kilometers from the epicenter.

Scientists from five countries subsequently presented data at the recent meeting of the American Geophysical Union (AGU) in San Francisco that support a connection between ULF radio signals and earthquakes above magnitude 5.0.

As we know, Earth's EM fields interacting with the solar wind coming into the upper atmosphere causes auroras. That is if these are auroras.

If not I'm sure I can weave in EM-cosmic ray interactions resulting in high-altitude cirrus formation via aerosol formation from highly ionizing particles into a (good enough for sci-fi) theory. I will use this (http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2006/10/taking-cosmic-rays-for-a-spin/) article for inspiration.

[Yo Mama]

If it's a precursor for the earthquake, why not one in Idaho or Illinois or wherever the pic at Nat Geo came from?

I think it's unrelated and coincidental. That's my story and I'm sticking to it.

BK, tell Gina I said hai. :P

[Bitchkoma]

If it's a precursor for the earthquake, why not one in Idaho or Illinois or wherever the pic at Nat Geo came from?


http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/63/Monarch_Viceroy_Mimicry_Comparison.jpg/800px-Monarch_Viceroy_Mimicry_Comparison.jpg

One is a Monarch Butterfly. The other is a Viceroy.

http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee260/iskandarreza/neurons.jpg

Image of neurons and their connections in the brain.

http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee260/iskandarreza/dark_matter_millenium_simulation.jpg

That of matter/dark matter distribution in the universe.

Point is, patterns repeat themselves in nature and two things may look alike but aren't. It may not have been clouds.

[Yo Mama]

It could very well have been.

But until and unless they can actually prove it, the best, simplest explanation is circumhorizontal arc.

Thus Spake Fuck You [bot].

[Ducky]

Let's see if I can make some kind of connect the dots out of this, from what you all told me so far.

1. Possible HAARP influence in the matter?
2. Does HAARP specialise in or have anything to do with EM's (Electro Magnetics)?
3. More earthquakes than usual in the last decade, on the Asian continent; specifically coastal regions - 'fire-ring' area.
4. These 'rainbows' are hardly ever seen at all (in other parts of the world; more of a rarity) before earthquakes commence. Isolated incidences? Mabey?
5. The above videos provided show two seperate occasions, from two seperate individuals.

I have a few more; just wanted to throw these ones out to see what you all think.

[Bitchkoma]

Oh. Fuck words and explanations. Put it simply, I'm right and you are SOOOOOOO wrong.

:cheers:

@Ducky. HAARP deals with exactly the kind of frequencies the Stanford earthquake link talks about.
Another possible reason for the sudden increase for these circumcision arc or whatever the hell GN thinks it is would be the same reason "chemtrails" are more prevalent -- there's more air traffic to form high altitude clouds that manifests these circumcision arcs.

[Yo Mama]

And the weathermen on this forum completely disagree with you. :P

http://www.easternuswx.com/bb/lofiversi ... 64906.html (http://www.easternuswx.com/bb/lofiversion/index.php/t164906.html)

[Bitchkoma]

Don't mess with me, I'll warn ya!

[Bitchkoma]

Ok, just read through that link. It doesn't debunk HAARP. There are FOIA documents on that shit. Besides, it's military. They always have more than one use for their toys.

[Ducky]

Besides, it's military. They always have more than one use for their toys.

It's their secret 'toys' that I'm worried about.

I've heard so many rumors and read from different sites that, the military has the potential to create earthquakes, and make them 'look natural'.

You guys have heard about this particular 'monument' somewhere in the U.S. whereby it contains a 'gaia-type' 10 commandments of what is to be achieved? Jeese...I can't remember the place, name, or anything about it, other than this piddly bit of info.

Anyways, apparently one of the so-called 10 commandments includes bringing the earth population down to 500 million.

'Creating earthquakes' would seem to fit the bill on that one, and no one would be the wiser.