PDA

View Full Version : Aircraft contrails contributing to global warming?



Bitchkoma
05-08-2008, 01:52 PM
[Old article of mine previously posted elsewhere sometime late in 2007]

http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee260/iskandarreza/contrails_main.jpg

The prevailing thought amongst the majority of the population is that carbon dioxide (CO2) produced from the burning of fossil fuels is the lead factor in global warming. While I am not doubting that CO2 is a greenhouse gas, I am somewhat unconvinced that it is as major a contributor to the effect as the press would have me believe.



Water, water, everywhere...

I find it peculiar that water vapour, a more potent greenhouse gas, is not receiving as much coverage in the press. According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), water vapour is the most abundant greenhouse gas on the planet.


Greenhouse Gases - Frequently Asked Questions (http://lwf.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/gases.html)
As the temperature of the atmosphere rises, more water is evaporated from ground storage (rivers, oceans, reservoirs, soil). Because the air is warmer, the relative humidity can be higher (in essence, the air is able to 'hold' more water when its warmer), leading to more water vapor in the atmosphere. As a greenhouse gas, the higher concentration of water vapor is then able to absorb more thermal IR energy radiated from the Earth, thus further warming the atmosphere. The warmer atmosphere can then hold more water vapor and so on and so on. This is referred to as a 'positive feedback loop'. However, huge scientific uncertainty exists in defining the extent and importance of this feedback loop. As water vapor increases in the atmosphere, more of it will eventually also condense into clouds, which are more able to reflect incoming solar radiation (thus allowing less energy to reach the Earth's surface and heat it up).

Here is another article detailing the effects of water vapour in the atmosphere, but unfortunately it has too many terms I am not familiar with. Perhaps someone else can explain it to me.

The climatic effects of water vapour (http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/17402)

With that out of the way, let me continue by addressing the topic title.



Jet-setting our way to warmer climes

It cannot be denied that air travel by members of the public has increased over the past few decades. The advent of budget airlines has increased this phenomena in order of magnitudes. But how is all this air travel affecting our planet? The most popular theories out there would argue that more carbon dioxide is injected directly into the atmosphere with so many planes up in the sky. Water vapour is again conveniently ignored.

Dr Nicola Stuber published a study in the journal Nature a theory proposing that water vapour from aircraft contrails can have a big impact on global warming. As reported in National Geographic News:

Nicola Stuber, first author of the study, to be published in tomorrow's edition of the journal Nature, suggests that contrails' overall impact on climate change is similar in scope to that of aircrafts' carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions over a hundred-year period.
Source: Airplane Contrails Boost Global Warming, Study Suggests (http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/06/060614-contrails.html)

According to Stuber, the effect is most pronounced at night. While contrails block out sunlight during the day, it prevents heat from radiating off into space at night. You could probably confirm this by observing the difference in the ambient temperature between cloudy and cloudless nights. To combat this, Stuber proposes a reduction in the number of night time flights.



High-altitude atmospheric roasting planes

Another research on the other hand suggests that the warming effect from air travel is produced by contrails that form at high altitudes. The researchers assert that contrails that form high in the sky form condensations that allow the heat from the sun to shine in but not radiate out.

High-altitude cirrus clouds, both natural and jet-induced, are unlike thicker low-altitude clouds, which block sunlight from reaching the surface. The thinner cirrus, which float in the sky at 20,000 feet or higher, act like a see-through blanket - letting sunlight pass in, while trapping reflected heat.
Source: Longer Airline Flights Proposed to Combat Global Warming (http://www.livescience.com/environment/050126_contrail_climate.html)


Their proposed solution? Fly at lower altitudes. That may be easier said than done, however. Flying at lower heights consumes more fuel and time, which could ultimately defeat the whole purpose of this exercise. Still, the scientists argue that the effect would be less damaging to the environment.



Conclusion: contrails confound climatologist

There is still much we need to know about how water vapour affects the climate. It doesn't help that water vapour can create a feedback loop of heating which creates more water vapour. In the final analysis, the jury is still out whether contrail formation effects global warming as significantly as proposed by some studies. I myself am inclined to believe that it does. Cloud-cover and ambient temperature is something you can observe by yourself, without the need for complex instruments. But perhaps a study conducted after the 9/11 attacks proved it best:

“September 11 – 14, 2001 had the biggest diurnal temperature range of any three-day period in the past 30 years,” said Andrew M. Carleton[1]. Not in three decades had there been such a large temperature spread between the daytime highs and the nighttime lows.
Source: Contrails: What’s Left Behind Is Bad News (http://www.airliners.net/articles/read.main?id=85)



Other Resources:
The importance of the diurnal and annual cycle of air traffic for contrail radiative forcing (http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v441/n7095/abs/nature04877.html)
Water builds the heat in Europe (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4419880.stm)
Global Warming Supercharged by Water Vapor? (http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/11/1110_051110_warming.html)

[More notes on aviation pollution]


Whether the jet set should grab a hair shirt over global warming is, well, a heated topic. The airline industry insists commercial airplanes, when tracked by the fuel needed per kilometre travelled per passenger, are on par with a fuel-efficient hybrid car. Air travel is responsible for about 2 per cent of global-warming emissions.

[...]

The controversy stems from the fact that high-altitude emissions - from nine to 13 kilometres up for subsonic flights and higher for supersonic - cause disproportionately more warming than those at ground level, anywhere from 50 per cent to four times as much, making its global-warming role more significant than its emissions tally alone would indicate.

Part of the worry is due to contrails, the thin vapour trails from jets that crisscross the sky above many of the world's most-travelled air routes. Contrails resemble artificial cirrus clouds, trapping heat, although there is no scientific consensus about the size of their leavening effect on global warming.

*Source (https://secure.acpa.ca/industrynews.htm) - Scroll down and look for the article titled "Aviation industry in eye of climate-change storm"

skunk
05-08-2008, 03:10 PM
Interestingly enough, I've read research saying that con/chemtrails are helping ease global warming.

There was a study done around 911 - before and after. All planes were grounded for a few days after the attacks in the US. Some factor in the weather change during that time and its supposed to be a significant piece of data. I am almost positive the conclusion was that contrails reflect the sun's rays and actually cool the Earth down.

That's right, contrails can have cooling affects. I was like...what?

Air traffic affects climate (http://archives.cnn.com/2002/TECH/science/08/07/contrails.climate/index.html)

http://archives.cnn.com/2002/TECH/science/08/07/contrails.climate/index.html

Check it out man, funky shit.

Bitchkoma
05-08-2008, 03:23 PM
Yes, that's the same study in my OP.

The contrails reflect light during the day, but at night heat that should radiate out also gets reflected towards the planet. It's like a blanket.

skunk
05-08-2008, 03:25 PM
Sick. Once we run out of fossil fuels, the planet is going to heat up even more. Life is good :)

Bitchkoma
05-08-2008, 03:28 PM
If we burn hydrogen, possibly. Hydrogen burns into water vapour.

Boondock
05-08-2008, 03:29 PM
didn't you know that everything is contributing to global warming these days....least that is what al gore says

Bitchkoma
05-08-2008, 03:34 PM
Al Gore is a douchebag. Fuck him.

Boondock
05-08-2008, 03:41 PM
Al Gore is a douchebag. Fuck him.


yeah, he kinda is

nudespook
05-09-2008, 11:49 AM
I find it peculiar that water vapour, a more potent greenhouse gas, is not receiving as much coverage in the press. According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), water vapour is the most abundant greenhouse gas on the planet.

Probably the only bit I think is a bit remiss. Water vapour attracts the attention it deserves. It is a feedback, and will enhance the forcing from other phenomena (e.g., CO2, land use etc).

Contrails are interesting though. Not sufficient for us to ignore 150 years of physics, of course.

Gore is just a normal politician - a bit of a chancer and opportunist. He's not that bad though. But I do wish he would keep his grubby political fingers out of the science.

Bitchkoma
05-09-2008, 02:18 PM
So water vapour is impotent in the absence of other GHGs?

At any rate, airplanes are still a major GHG contributor and the industry continues to grow rapidly. And then there's this:

Airline Emissions: Even Worse Than You Think (http://blog.wired.com/cars/2008/05/airline-emissio.html)
A recently disclosed report finds that airlines are spewing 20 percent more carbon dioxide into the environment than previously estimated and the amount could hit 1.5 billion tons a year by 2025. That's far more than even the worst-case predictions laid out by the International Panel on Climate Change.

If you're looking to put that number in perspective, the European Union currently emits 3.1 billion tons of CO2 annually. Yup, that's the entire 27-nation, 457 million person EU.

nudespook
05-09-2008, 02:28 PM
Sort of. Water vapour is in an equilibrium which is controlled by temperature.

So, decrease temps, less water vapour. Increase temps, increase water vapour. Release billions of tonnes of water vapour, it just rains out pretty quick, reaching the appropriate equilibrium (i.e. a very short half-life cf. other GHGs).

Thus, it's not just related to other GHGs, but other factors that might influence temperature. Even contrails.

Even then it's not ignored, but is actually a big factor in the feedback response from future CO2 et al scenarios.

skunk
05-09-2008, 02:49 PM
Nitric oxide and methane are more potent than CO2...as greenhouse gases go anyway.