Strobe Lights

[johnlear]

A couple of days ago I was reviewing all of the UA175 video tapes.

I finally realized why they look so fake.

There are no strobe lights in any of the videos.

FAA requires all planes to have strobe lights on the wing tips. They are extremely bright and flash every second or so.

When an airliner is cleared into position for takeoff, the captain commands the “Before Takeoff Checklist to the line.�

What that means is several items are checked or placed in the proper position for take off.

When the airplane is cleared for takeoff the captain commands “Below the line� or

“Final items�.

This list is very short but contains strobe lights and transponder. The reason these items are held until the airplane is read to roll is that the strobes tend to blind aircraft landing on the same
runway and aircraft waiting for takeoff even if it is daytime.

The reason the transponder is not turned on until the takeoff roll is the secondary code or ‘blip’ would hide information on the radar screen from the local controller.

After reviewing many of the UA175 videos I cannot see any evidence of the strobes flashing which should be very obvious.

This confirms my suspicion tht both WTC crashes were CGI or holographs. In either the case of the holograph or Computer Graphics it wold be very difficult if not impossible to duplicate the intense bright of the strobe every second on the wing tips where the strobes are located.

Next time you are around an airport take a look at an airliner in flight and notice the strobes on the wing tips. See if you don’t think they would show up on the videos.

[skunk]

John,

Just because the plane that hit the WTC wasn't a commercial airliner doesn't rule out the military plane or a missile.

The US air force has 727, 737, 747, 757, 767, and I'm sure 777s that are exact copies of civilian aircraft, except for a few minor differences.

In many of the videos and pictures, there seems to be a huge bump on the bottom of the plane(s) that hit the WTC. There were no windows visible. This means that it was more than likely a military jet that was flown into the WTC probably by remote control as it would take a maverick pilot to fly the plane 500mph a few hundred feet above the ground (IF its even possible, the wind speed would be ridiculously high and probably break the sucker if it wasn't reinforced).

As for the pentagon, possibly a missile/drone attack and/or explosion from the inside.

All in all, a grand government conspiracy far above the JFK assassination.

[johnlear]

John,

Just because the plane that hit the WTC wasn't a commercial airliner doesn't rule out the military plane or a missile.

The US air force has 727, 737, 747, 757, 767, and I'm sure 777s that are exact copies of civilian aircraft, except for a few minor differences.

In many of the videos and pictures, there seems to be a huge bump on the bottom of the plane(s) that hit the WTC. There were no windows visible. This means that it was more than likely a military jet that was flown into the WTC probably by remote control as it would take a maverick pilot to fly the plane 500mph a few hundred feet above the ground (IF its even possible, the wind speed would be ridiculously high and probably break the sucker if it wasn't reinforced).

As for the pentagon, possibly a missile/drone attack and/or explosion from the inside.

All in all, a grand government conspiracy far above the JFK assassination.



Sorry. No plane, military jet or otherwise hit the WTC. Even if it was a military 767 it still has turbofans and turbofans cannot fly at high speeds at low altitudes because of compression problems.

And 777's? When did the Air Force get a 777?

The 767 military or civilian is limited to 360 Vmo which is velocity max operating at sea level. If you cram the throttles full forward all you are going to do is stall the enginee, EGT will rise and the turbines will melt.

No plane hit the Pentagon as April Gallop was 40 feet from the hole and saw no airplane, no missile and smelled no fuel.

Hope this helps.

Thanks for your post. :)

[dk3000]

A couple of days ago I was reviewing all of the UA175 video tapes.

I finally realized why they look so fake.

Next time you are around an airport take a look at an airliner in flight and notice the strobes on the wing tips. See if you don’t think they would show up on the videos.

In a word WOW! I never thought of that. I can't believe I never realized that before this moment!

I have gone over the footage several times and there is no strobe on either plane- being that strobes are a non-essential element for tracking the flight- and they are used to help nearby flying aircraft identify each other in case a screw up with air traffic control occurs- my point is- a Hijacker would have no reason to turn off strobes and/or transponders even if they knew about them because it would not make any difference!!

Thanks John- this is an excellent point. I always thought that CGI and holographs were a bit over the top- but this fresh insight (its fresh to me) demonstrates that it is something more than consideration.

There has been an unusual amount of air traffic in my area and increasing dramatically over the last six months (military helicopters, a black unidentifiable helicopter, various plain white unmarked single and double engine planes) My point is- all of these craft have one thing in common- they all have visible strobes in daylight as well as night flight.

All 9/11 video footage of aircraft do not have any strobes whatsoever!

Here is my question John:

The footage of the impact could NOT be faked- so was a smaller vehicle used with something strapped to its underbelly- a holographic device maybe? Many question the underbelly as carrying micro-nukes- I am sure you have heard all the different theories.

After careful examination: What do you think hit the towers?

[johnlear]

After careful examination: What do you think hit the towers?



Nothing dk. Nothing 'hit' the towers. Nothing. Nothing. Nothing.

It was all controlled demo to look like an airplane went in.

The Wile E. Coyote cartoon cutout of an alleged Boeing 767 hitting the WTC is beyond ridiculous. A speeding airplane couldn't possibly cut concrete and stell like that.

A missile? No. Too risky. Too many variables. The only way they could pull this off was with controlled demo.

[skunk]

I agree that there were micronukes or some sort of explosive device in the WTC. Not to mention thermite found at the bottom...

I have one question: How would a hologram be able to mimic 2 planes colliding with the towers precisely? There was the visual and acoustic aspect. Was "black budget" hologram technology really that far ahead of civilian tech?

I have no doubt the official story is bunk. I've done quite a bit of research on that. I also believe multiple intelligence agencies, governments, and corporations/businesses were involved with this attack.

What is the motive for the attack? A middle eastern empire centered around Israel?

[johnlear]

I agree that there were micronukes or some sort of explosive device in the WTC. Not to mention thermite found at the bottom...

There were no micronukes. Controlled demo using conventional explosives created the initial damage. About an hour later, Direct Energy Weapons on a space based orbiting platform used molecular disassociation technology to disintegrate the WTC's.


I have one question: How would a hologram be able to mimic 2 planes colliding with the towers precisely? There was the visual and acoustic aspect. Was "black budget" hologram technology really that far ahead of civilian tech?

Holographic technology is very advanced and can project images with sound, light and heat. Secret military technology is about 40 years ahead of where we are now.

http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/6799/holographatsbmv6.png



I have no doubt the official story is bunk. I've done quite a bit of research on that. I also believe multiple intelligence agencies, governments, and corporations/businesses were involved with this attack.

What is the motive for the attack? A middle eastern empire centered around Israel?

The number one reason for the attack was to have a pretext to enter Afghanistan and jump start the poppy production which went from 24% of the worlds production in 2001 to 94% of the world production by last September. We control the flow and reap the profit from the sale and distribution of illegal drugs worldwide. With that kind of cash the military industrial Nazi complex does not have to go to Congress for anything.

The second reason was to enter Iraq tro steal their oil and build major bases from which we will attack Iran so that we can steal their oil and use their country to pipe the oil from the Caspien Sea to the Persian Gulf. :)

[skunk]

There were no micronukes. Controlled demo using conventional explosives created the initial damage. About an hour later, Direct Energy Weapons on a space based orbiting platform used molecular disassociation technology to disintegrate the WTC's.

So every floor had TNT on it set to explode just as the "plane" hit?

Can you further describe what a DEW weapon is and what technology disintegrated the WTC?

Thanks.



Holographic technology is very advanced and can project images with sound, light and heat. Secret military technology is about 40 years ahead of where we are now.

If the government has UFOs in its arsenal, I don't doubt advanced holographic technology.

I am really curious where you find most of you information though. Would you be able to help me out and explain what this technology would do?

Cool picture by the way :)




The number one reason for the attack was to have a pretext to enter Afghanistan and jump start the poppy production which went from 24% of the worlds production in 2001 to 94% of the world production by last September. We control the flow and reap the profit from the sale and distribution of illegal drugs worldwide. With that kind of cash the military industrial Nazi complex does not have to go to Congress for anything.

I can see that. The Taliban was anti-poppy and now that we invaded, the Northern Alliance and other warlords have helped the US government black budget increase tenfold.

Don't forget about the cannabis production :) . Afghanistan is known for bomb ass weed.

Oh and the CIA's cocaine planes, but I suppose that's another story isn't it? But all connected...



The second reason was to enter Iraq tro steal their oil and build major bases from which we will attack Iran so that we can steal their oil and use their country to pipe the oil from the Caspien Sea to the Persian Gulf. :)

Well that seems to be already happening now. Bush/Cheney have mentioned "our" oil is at stake in Iraq.

Here's a picture of one of the pipelines:

http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/pipelinemap.gif


And this one is a favorite of mine:

http://www.worldproutassembly.org/images/middleastmap.jpg

[johnlear]

So every floor had TNT on it set to explode just as the "plane" hit?

No only the floor it hit, a couple above and a couple below and a few others.


Can you further describe what a DEW weapon is and what technology disintegrated the WTC?

Simply put Direct Energy Weapons use lasers in delivering large amounts of power to a small area. As the energy (heat) can only escape the are by conduction or radiation, both slow processes, the temperature gradually increases (lathering up) and then the material vaporizes.

Just before the WTC collapsed there was a lot of smoke, this was the DEW lathering up the building,with a laser pointed directly down from low earth orbit. The reason that no concrete was left in any form other than 80 micron sized dust was that it a essentially vaporized by what they call molecular disassociation. They disintegrated the buiding and everthing in it by disintegrating it as a molecular level.

The steel would have taken longer to disintegrate so what they did is thermite all of the steel in the building into 30 foot lengths so that they would fit perfectly on Rudy's trucks.

Here is a chart of the Global Area Strike System (GLASS) which uses High Energy Weapons which are ground based and use mirrors to reflect the energy. This is from a military document published in the 1990's but as you can see they had already identified Iran as a target (labeled 'Battlefield').


http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/4546/globalareastrikesystemtj4.png



I am really curious where you find most of you information though.

thelivingmoon.com


Would you be able to help me out and explain what this technology would do?

Will eliminate anything, anywhere, anytime.


I can see that. The Taliban was anti-poppy and now that we invaded, the Northern Alliance and other warlords have helped the US government black budget increase tenfold.

Yes, the Taliban were burning the poppy fields and that had to be put to a stop.


Don't forget about the cannabis production :) . Afghanistan is known for bomb ass weed.

Oh and the CIA's cocaine planes, but I suppose that's another story isn't it? But all connected...

Its all the same story: greed.

[dk3000]

One of the most interesting things about space based weapons is that both me and friend have watched the night skies over Los Angeles- and what appear to be two distance stars are NOT stars at all. They blink, flash and strobe- often changing positions. This coupled with the increased air traffic of various craft has finally led my friend and I to the same conclusion.

Huge gray unmarked helicopters were buzzing the building I live in to the point of rattling windows and knocking things off the walls. Upon going out side I would see these aircraft and some of them were as big as buildings with four and sometimes five propellers. I assumed because of the gray matte colors of the craft that they were Naval. They had no markings, numbers and they flew in the direction of downtown Los Angeles. Over six months time it was getting quite irritating. Some of the craft were smaller and would have silent white unmarked small airplanes following in formation as if being towed. No one in my building noticed them- I could not understand how- but they did not and looked at me like I was paranoid and nuts when I spoke of the topic.

I began posting in various forums on the net to see if anyone anywhere was experiencing anything similar or the same. Eventually my friend came by and finally saw this phenomenon for himself and was blown away. Then the activity stopped after I had posted about the 20th query on different sites.

That said- the aircraft began to appear at night- and was very silent- many different strobes of various colors. My friend said they are definitely doing drills of some kind. He felt the Stars that are not stars is some kind of surveillance satellites. However the satellites that I have actually seen do not emit lights or strobes- so my opinion is they are for surveillance.

I think they are "projecting" all kinds of whatever it is- and now with this revelation I can see where it may be holographic projectors- possibly projecting bogus UFO and other phenomenon.

I go by my gut instincts rather than posting photos/videos simply to have them debunked. I am not a photographer nor a DP of any talent or skill so another blurry picture would only add to a hoax scam- which none of us needs.

John, you have done enough research that I am willing to rely on you for the truth in these matters which require study. I am happy to take your word that planes did not hit the towers. You explanation suits me just fine and it does feel right. Thank you!

That said. Do you have any explanation for the claims of family who were supposedly killed in the attacks? I hope this question is not off topic- its the only thing left I have a problem with.

[century]

ForeignPolicyMag (http://www.youtube.com/user/ForeignPolicyMag) — October 25, 2006 — Vision: To exploit the military potential of directed energy to achieve asymmetric advantage over our adversaries.

Mission: Develop, integrate, and transition science and technology for directed energy to include high power microwaves, lasers, adaptive optics, imaging, and effects to assure the preeminence of the United States in air and space. * To support user needs for directed energy weapons applications and to address mission area deficiencies. * To exploit directed energy technology for Air Force and Department of Defense applications. * To avoid technological surprise. * To foster user awareness of the potential of directed energy for Air Force and Department of Defense applications. * To explore directed energy technology that offers high payoff for directed energy capabilities and applications.
mSGprwJx_zs

[Royal]

Strobes during the day?


GTFO.

THIS THEORY DISCREDITS 9/11 TRUTH MOVEMENT. FUCK YOU JOHN.

I ONCE HAD FAITH IN YOU. BUT THIS POOR HALOGRAPHIC THOUGHT DEMOLISHED YOUR TWIN TOWERS OF CREDIBILITY.

[Ethereal_Resonance]

Ah, the good old days of Amkon; decent thread spoilt by petulant tit-heads.

[Cogburn]

The only petulant tit-head in this thread was Lear.

[Royal]

The whole 9/11 problem can be explained with better evidence. This halographic crap will scare many away from the movement.

If you don't see that, than you are an idiot. STICK TO WHAT"S KNOWN. I BELIEVE IN REPTILIANS BUT I"M NOT GOING TO MENTION THAT SHIT TO EXPLAIN 9/11... get my drift...

[captainkiwi]

good to see ya back John interesting points you raise

[Royal]

John Lear = reptilian agenda.

[captainkiwi]

John Lear = reptilian agenda.

long live the lizard king
rwOFio6MsZ8&feature=related

[Lexion]

"Halographic" ?

Like the game ?

Oh, JL is not back.

Lurking, yes.

Posting, no.