PDA

View Full Version : What the heck is Endeavour doing right now?



johnlear
03-12-2008, 12:53 PM
March 12, 2008 0751 PDT: What Is Endeavour Doing Right Now?



Endeavour has now been in space about 32 hours. Since it only takes 9 minutes to achieve orbit and another 30 minutes to dock, what has Endeavour been doing with the other 31 hours?

And since she is not going to dock until tonight at 11:25 EDT what did she do during that 45 hours from launch?

The NASA disinformation artists would have you believe that all of this time has been spent catching up with the International Space Station. This, of course, is disinformation to keep you, the public, from knowing the truth.

And the truth is that Endeavour, like all other Space Shuttles since its first launch in April of 1981 has been dropping off and picking up cargo from our secret space platforms of which there are about 12.

These secret space platforms include weapons and manufacturing platforms. The weapons platforms are the same as the one used to destroy the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001 killing 3000 Americans, when we attacked ourselves to create a threat which did not exist.

The orbiting manufacturing platforms are used to manufacture materials used in the construction of secret military aerial craft and sea going vessels including submarines.

The specifics of the material which comes in bars, extrusions, sheet and rolled product will be covered in another article.

During the 45 hours it will take Endeavour to service several space stations the public will listen to NASA describe how the astronauts are going through 'checklists' preparing to dock with the ISS, exercising on stationary bicycles and trying to catch gumdrops in '0' gravity.

Meanwhile, a Russian Progress rocket will have docked carrying 'food and supplies' and it will allegedly be loaded with 'trash' and will be sent to 'burn up' on reentry.

Of course, all of this is nonsense. The Progress rocket brings up raw materials for the manufacturing platforms and additional astronauts required.

The Space Shuttle which was designed for allegedly 10 astronauts probably can carry several more. Space shuttle launches and landings have at least 5 more astronauts aboard than is told to the public by NASA.

Other rockets launched by NASA or the Air Force or the Navy
can take additional astronauts to the orbiting platforms as does Progress.

I estimate that there are about 1500 astronauts orbiting in the various platforms.

Following the STS-123 docking with the ISS the crew will perform a lot of 'busy' work, installing this and checking out that. Any NASA photos of the ISS will exclude that many space tugs and other space vehicles which constantly dock and undock with the ISS.

The public is made to believe that the only visitors to the ISS are the Russian Progress 'garbage can' and the Space Shuttle and every photo you see of the ISS is carefully choreographed to make you believe that is up their 'alone'.

After a stay of 13 days or so the Space Shuttle will undock with the ISS and, although it takes on 35 minutes to deorbit and land at the Kennedy Space Center it will take more than 2 days to do the checklists required and will also include two eight hour rest periods. So you are told.

Of course, this is nonsense. What is really going on is that the Russian Progress, which arrived several days before the Shuttle, has brought up cargo which needs to be distributed to various other space platforms. During the 13 days at ISS those materials are packed on board the Space shuttle and then off loaded to the other platforms during the 2 day period after undocking.

This two day period after undocking is also used to dock with and perform maintenance on various secret satellites.

After the 2 days of secret docking the Space Shuttle will eventually de-orbit and land at Kennedy Space Center.

Out of sight of the prying eyes of the public 10 to fifteen astronauts will deplane and thousands of pounds of highly classified manufactured material will be unloaded.

But all you will see is the smiling faces of the seven astronauts said to have gone on the mission furiously exercising their bicycles and popping their gumdrops.

mojo
03-12-2008, 01:06 PM
There was supposedly something seen on the live feed outside of the shuttle while it was in orbit. The camera was quickly changed back to a view of mission control which strangely also had there screen out.

:?

johnlear
03-12-2008, 02:58 PM
There was supposedly something seen on the live feed outside of the shuttle while it was in orbit. The camera was quickly changed back to a view of mission control which strangely also had there screen out.

:?



Much more than you could possibly imagine is going on in, around and on the ISS. It is getting to be very difficult to get camera shots which don't include stuff you shouldn't see. Its easier just to say the camera is broken.

Alessandra
03-12-2008, 03:26 PM
I read somewhere they were phasing out the Space Shuttle by 2012, assuming we're all alive by that time, wtf are they going to be using? I'm assuming Orion program isnt going to be that stable, they just started testing it this year... 4 years isnt long enough to 'perfect' something like that, is it? Or will Nasa be phased out as well and replaced with commercialism (i.e. Virgin Galactic)... so wtf are they going to be using to get to the ISS (and other places)?

Sorry for slightly OT...

johnlear
03-12-2008, 03:40 PM
I read somewhere they were phasing out the Space Shuttle by 2012, assuming we're all alive by that time, wtf are they going to be using?


We have been sending astronauts and equipment into space for almost 60 years. We use a number of different methods, some rocket powered some anti-grav. The Space Shuttle is just a cover, it is not the real main method of placing astronauts and equipment into space.

Nothing special is going to happen in 2012. That is just propaganda to keep the public in a constant state of worry.


I'm assuming Orion program isnt going to be that stable, they just started testing it this year... 4 years isnt long enough to 'perfect' something like that, is it?

Orion is just a cover, s scam.


Or will Nasa be phased out as well and replaced with commercialism (i.e. Virgin Galactic)... so wtf are they going to be using to get to the ISS (and other places)?

Yes, the NAZA NAZI's will be phased out eventually and their evil plans thwarted. :)

Iamsix
03-13-2008, 10:50 AM
Mr Lear question for you. How is it then, that none of these "extra" space station have not been seen from the ground? If they are in such a close orbit with earth you should be able to see them. You can photo graph sats that are in low enough orbits with powerful binoculars, but you are not able to see massive space stations? No reflections from the sun off of them?

johnlear
03-13-2008, 11:12 AM
Mr Lear question for you. How is it then, that none of these "extra" space station have not been seen from the ground? If they are in such a close orbit with earth you should be able to see them. You can photo graph sats that are in low enough orbits with powerful binoculars, but you are not able to see massive space stations? No reflections from the sun off of them?


Apparently you are not paying attention. Please check out these photos:

http://www.thelivingmoon.com/43ancients ... ft_01.html (http://www.thelivingmoon.com/43ancients/41Group_Lunar_FYEO/02files/FYEO_Spacecraft_01.html)

or Google F.A.S.T.

Yes, the sun does reflect off of them however they use a stealth coating which subdues that reflection.

Iamsix
03-13-2008, 11:20 AM
No its not that I have not been paying attention. Its that I have never seen those photos in the link you gave. Simple question nothing more. If you have others I would be interested in seeing them also. Thanks

johnlear
03-13-2008, 01:04 PM
No its not that I have not been paying attention. Its that I have never seen those photos in the link you gave. Simple question nothing more. If you have others I would be interested in seeing them also. Thanks


Please accept my apologies then.

I thought that when you asked your simple question "How is it then, that none of these "extra" space station have not been seen from the ground?" that you had actually checked to see if any 'extra' space stations had been seen from the ground.

Again, please accept my apologies. :)

Iamsix
03-19-2008, 10:20 AM
It is one thing to have "claimed" to have seen them. Talk is cheap. On the net anyone can claim anything. Hard evidence is better. Such as photographs. I have read claims that people have "seen" such objects. I have done a little research, but I have better things to do with my time than go through 1,000,000 pages of mindless drivial. I dont take such claims at face value. I had not seen your pictures before. I thank you sincerley for posting them. I was looking for you opinion as to why they had not been seen, so there was no need for such a catty reply. It was a sincere question. No attack intended. But since you fired back.....

BTW apology accepted. Thank you

johnlear
03-20-2008, 12:56 PM
In a few days here it will be March 24, day fifteen for Endeavour and time for her to come home.

The time it takes to deorbit and land at Kennedy Space Center is 35 minutes.

But from the time she undocks from the ISS it will take her over 40 hours to land at the Space Center.

Why?


Because she has onloaded a lot of supplies from Russian Progress rockets that came up just before she arrived at the ISS.

She also has to deliver some astronauts to other Space Platforms.

Endeavour is going to be a very busy Space Shuttle getting all that work done before deorbiting.

Remember how there is usually 5 to 7 astronauts aboard the Shuttle? Well there are officially 10 seats. There are probably 3 or 4 more, so while NASA keeps our eye on the 7 astronauts, there are 6 or 7 more astronauts going up and down which you aren't supposed to know anything about.

And the Space Shuttle isn't the only vehicle that takes Astronauts up to the platforms. They also launch in Titan 4's.

And there are other space vehicles also. This vehicle was spotted over Ireland on descent to somewhere near or at Macrahanish. The vehicle was reported to be at least 10 times the size of a Boeing 747:

http://img405.imageshack.us/img405/9939/spaceplanebrl9.png

Here are the details of where it was spotted:

http://img405.imageshack.us/img405/9857/spaceplanemapaah2.png


Did you really think the Space Shuttle was the best we had? :)